AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horner, N. K
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horner, N. K
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, R. L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Horner, N. K
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, R. L
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 76, No. 4, 766-773, October 2002
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Participant characteristics associated with errors in self-reported energy intake from the Women’s Health Initiative food-frequency questionnaire1,2,3

Neilann K Horner, Ruth E Patterson, Marian L Neuhouser, Johanna W Lampe, Shirley A Beresford and Ross L Prentice

1 From the Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (NKH, REP, MLN, JWL, SAB, and RLP), and the Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington (REP, JWL, and SAB), Seattle.

Background: Errors in self-reported dietary intake threaten inferences from studies relying on instruments such as food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs), food records, and food recalls.

Objective: The objective was to quantify the magnitude, direction, and predictors of errors associated with energy intakes estimated from the Women’s Health Initiative FFQ.

Design: Postmenopausal women (n = 102) provided data on sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics that relate to errors in self-reported energy intake. Energy intake was objectively estimated as total energy expenditure, physical activity expenditure, and the thermic effect of food (10% addition to other components of total energy expenditure).

Results: Participants underreported energy intake on the FFQ by 20.8%; this error trended upward with younger age (P = 0.07) and social desirability (P = 0.09) but was not associated with body mass index (P = 0.95). The correlation coefficient between reported energy intake and total energy expenditure was 0.24; correlations were higher among women with less education, higher body mass index, and greater fat-free mass, social desirability, and dissatisfaction with perceived body size (all P < 0.10).

Conclusions: Energy intake is generally underreported, and both the magnitude of the error and the association of the self-reporting with objectively estimated intake appear to vary by participant characteristics. Studies relying on self-reported intake should include objective measures of energy expenditure in a subset of participants to identify person-specific bias within the study population for the dietary self-reporting tool; these data should be used to calibrate the self-reported data as an integral aspect of diet and disease association studies.

Key Words: Dietary records • systematic bias • dietary measurement error • energy expenditure • postmenopausal women • Women’s Health Initiative




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. L. Neuhouser, L. Tinker, P. A. Shaw, D. Schoeller, S. A. Bingham, L. V. Horn, S. A. A. Beresford, B. Caan, C. Thomson, S. Satterfield, et al.
Use of Recovery Biomarkers to Calibrate Nutrient Consumption Self-Reports in the Women's Health Initiative
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2008; 167(10): 1247 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
K. Watson, T. Baranowski, D. Thompson, R. Jago, J. Baranowski, and L. M. Klesges
Innovative application of a multidimensional item response model in assessing the influence of social desirability on the pseudo-relationship between self-efficacy and behavior
Health Educ. Res., December 1, 2006; 21(suppl_1): i85 - i97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Halkjaer, A. Tjonneland, B. L Thomsen, K. Overvad, and T. I. Sorensen
Intake of macronutrients as predictors of 5-y changes in waist circumference.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 789 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. A. Blanton, A. J. Moshfegh, D. J. Baer, and M. J. Kretsch
The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method Accurately Estimates Group Total Energy and Nutrient Intake
J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2594 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. E. Foster-Schubert, A. McTiernan, R. S. Frayo, R. S. Schwartz, K. B. Rajan, Y. Yasui, S. S. Tworoger, and D. E. Cummings
Human Plasma Ghrelin Levels Increase during a One-Year Exercise Program
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 820 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. A Tooze, A. F Subar, F. E Thompson, R. Troiano, A. Schatzkin, and V. Kipnis
Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 795 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Nutrition