AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbertson, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Werther, G. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilbertson, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Werther, G. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilbertson, H. R
Right arrow Articles by Werther, G. A
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 1, 83-90, January 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Effect of low-glycemic-index dietary advice on dietary quality and food choice in children with type 1 diabetes1,2,3

Heather R Gilbertson, Anne W Thorburn, Jennie C Brand-Miller, Patty Chondros and George A Werther

1 From the Departments of Nutrition and Food Services (HRG), Endocrinology and Diabetes (GAW), and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (PC), Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne; the Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne (PC); the Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital (AWT); and the Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Sydney (JCB-M).

Background: The practicality of diets with a low glycemic index (GI) is controversial. Theoretically, low-GI diets may limit food choice and increase dietary fat intake, but there is little objective evidence to support such a theory.

Objective: The objective was to determine the effect of low-GI dietary advice on dietary quality and food choice in children with diabetes.

Design: Children aged 8–13 y with type 1 diabetes (n = 104) were recruited to a prospective, randomized study comparing the effects of traditional carbohydrate-exchange dietary advice (CHOx) with those of more flexible low-GI dietary advice (LowGI). We determined the effect on long-term macronutrient intake and food choice with the use of 3-d food diaries.

Results: There were no differences in reported macronutrient intakes during any of the recording periods. After 12 mo, intakes of dietary fat (33.5 ± 5.6% and 34.2 ± 6.7% of energy, P = 0.65), carbohydrate (48.8 ± 5.4% and 48.6 ± 6.5% of energy, P = 0.86), protein (17.6 ± 2.5% and 17.3 ± 3.7% of energy, P = 0.61), total sugars, and fiber did not differ significantly between the CHOx and LowGI groups, respectively. The average number of different carbohydrate food choices per day also did not differ significantly. Subjects in the lowest-GI quartile consumed less carbohydrate as potato and white bread, but more carbohydrate as dairy-based foods and whole-grain breads than did subjects in the highest-GI quartile.

Conclusion: Children with diabetes who receive low-GI dietary advice do not report more limited food choices or a diet with worse macronutrient composition than do children who consume a traditional carbohydrate-exchange diet.

Key Words: Type 1 diabetes • children • glycemic index • dietary quality • food variety • fat intake • carbohydrate sources • dietary adherence




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. Du, D. L van der A, M. M. van Bakel, C. J. van der Kallen, E. E Blaak, M. M. van Greevenbroek, E. H. Jansen, G. Nijpels, C. D. Stehouwer, J. M Dekker, et al.
Glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to food and nutrient intake and metabolic risk factors in a Dutch population
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 655 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
S. Scaglioni, M. Sala, G. Stival, M. Giroli, C. Raimondil, M. Salvioni, G. Radaelli, C. Agostoni, E. Riva, and M. Giovannini
Dietary Glycemic Load and Macronutrient Intake in Healthy Italian Children
Asia Pac J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 17(2): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
J. L. Sievenpiper and V. Vuksan
Glycemic Index in the Treatment of Diabetes: The Debate Continues
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 23(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
J. W. Anderson, K. M. Randles, C. W. C. Kendall, and D. J. A. Jenkins
Carbohydrate and Fiber Recommendations for Individuals with Diabetes: A Quantitative Assessment and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 23(1): 5 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. Jimenez-Cruz, M. Bacardi-Gascon, W. H. Turnbull, P. Rosales-Garay, and I. Severino-Lugo
A Flexible, Low-Glycemic Index Mexican-Style Diet in Overweight and Obese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Improves Metabolic Parameters During a 6-Week Treatment Period
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2003; 26(7): 1967 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition