AJCN 19th International Congress of Nutrition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sainz, R. D
Right arrow Articles by Urlando, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sainz, R. D
Right arrow Articles by Urlando, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sainz, R. D
Right arrow Articles by Urlando, A.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 2, 364-370, February 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Evaluation of a new pediatric air-displacement plethysmograph for body-composition assessment by means of chemical analysis of bovine tissue phantoms1,2,3

Roberto D Sainz and Alessandro Urlando

1 From the Department of Animal Science, the University of California, Davis (RDS), and Life Measurement Inc, Concord, CA (AU).

Background: Body-composition assessment reflects infant growth and nutritional status but is limited by practical considerations, accuracy, and safety.

Objective: This study evaluated the precision and accuracy of a new air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) system for pediatric body-composition assessment.

Design: We used 24 phantoms constructed from bovine lean muscle and fat. The phantoms varied in mass (1.3894–9.9516 kg) and percentage fat (%Fat; 2.08–34.40%), thereby representing infants between birth and 6 mo of age. Estimates of %Fat obtained with chemical analysis (CA), hydrostatic weighing, and ADP were compared.

Results: There was no significant difference between %Fat measured with ADP (%FatADP) and %Fat measured with CA (%FatCA); the mean values were 18.55% and 18.59%, respectively. SDs for %FatADP and %FatCA were not significantly different (0.70% and 0.73%, respectively). %Fat measurements obtained with ADP, CA, and hydrostatic weighing were highly correlated (r > 0.99, P < 0.0001). The regression equation (%FatCA = 0.996%FatADP + 0.119; SEE = 0.600; adjusted R2 = 0.997; P < 0.0001) did not differ significantly from the line of identity (%FatCA = %FatADP). There was high agreement between individual measurements of %FatADP and %FatCA, as shown by the narrow 95% limits of agreements between methods (-1.22% to 1.13%), and there was no systematic bias in individual differences across the phantom mass and %Fat ranges.

Conclusion: ADP provides a highly precise and accurate estimate of %Fat in bovine tissue phantoms in the pediatric ranges of body weight and body fatness.

Key Words: Body composition • infants • air-displacement plethysmography • chemical analysis • precision • accuracy • body fat • infant growth • infant nutrition • pediatrics • pediatric nutrition




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. J Ellis, M. Yao, R. J Shypailo, A. Urlando, W. W Wong, and W. C Heird
Body-composition assessment in infancy: air-displacement plethysmography compared with a reference 4-compartment model
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 90 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Ma, M. Yao, Y. Liu, A. Lin, H. Zou, A. Urlando, W. W Wong, L. Nommsen-Rivers, and K. G Dewey
Validation of a new pediatric air-displacement plethysmograph for assessing body composition in infants
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2004; 79(4): 653 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition