AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verheijden, M. W
Right arrow Articles by van Staveren, W. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verheijden, M. W
Right arrow Articles by van Staveren, W. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Verheijden, M. W
Right arrow Articles by van Staveren, W. A
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 4, 1058S-1064S, April 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Nutrition guidance in Dutch family practice: behavioral determinants of reduction of fat consumption1,2,3,4

Marieke W Verheijden, Juul E van der Veen, Wieteke M van Zadelhoff, Carel Bakx, Maria A Koelen, Henk JM van den Hoogen, Chris van Weel and Wija A van Staveren

1 From the Divisions of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology (MWV, JEVDV, WMVZ, and WAVS), and Communication and Innovation Studies (MAK), Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands; Department of Family and Social Medicine, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (CB, HJMVDH, and CVW).

Background: Studies have shown that the psychosocial determinants attitude, self-efficacy, subjective norm, and health threat are important in predicting intention to change fat consumption. However, the role of habit in relation to these determinants is still largely unknown.

Objective: We aimed to assess whether and how habit influences intention in relation to attitude, self-efficacy, subjective norm, and health threat.

Design: Cross-sectionally, we studied the self-reported psychosocial determinants and intention of 105 (52 intervention, 53 control) patients who participated in a family practice–based tailored nutrition counseling intervention study for lowering cardiovascular risk. Fat intake 15 mo before the assessment of psychosocial determinants was used as a measure of habit. We used logistic regression analyses to develop a model predicting intention to change fat consumption.

Results: Our regression model explained 43% of the variance in intention. Patients who perceived higher subjective norm or more social support had a higher intention. Habit was a significant predictor of intention in interaction with self-efficacy and health threat. Attitude, health threat, age, and group membership (ie, whether patients had been in the intervention group or the control group of the intervention study) were also included in the regression model.

Conclusions: The results suggest that habit in addition to subjective norm and the other more frequently investigated psychosocial determinants are important in predicting intention to change fat consumption. To achieve sustainable health improvement through nutrition education programs, these programs should therefore start focusing more on subjective norm and habit.

Key Words: Habit • psychosocial factors • health education • behavior change • fat-restricted diet • adults




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A S. Truswell, G. J Hiddink, and J. Blom
Nutrition guidance by family doctors in a changing world: problems, opportunities, and future possibilities
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2003; 77(4): 1089S - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition