AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stolk, R. P
Right arrow Articles by van der Graaf, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stolk, R. P
Right arrow Articles by van der Graaf, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stolk, R. P
Right arrow Articles by van der Graaf, Y.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 4, 857-860, April 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Ultrasound measurements of intraabdominal fat estimate the metabolic syndrome better than do measurements of waist circumference1,2

Ronald P Stolk, Rudy Meijer, Willem PTM Mali, Diederick E Grobbee and Yolanda van der Graaf on behalf of the Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART) Study Group

1 From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (RPS, RM, DEG, and YvdG) and the Department of Radiology (RPS, RM, and WPTMM), University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.

Background: We recently developed an ultrasound technique to estimate intraabdominal fat (IAF). This method is more accurate than measurement of waist and hip circumferences and is simpler and less expensive than computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Objective: We compared the associations of ultrasound and waist-circumference (WC) measurements of IAF with other components of the metabolic syndrome.

Design: IAF was determined in 600 consecutive participants in the Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART) study. The mean (± SD) age was 56.1 ± 12.6 y, 30.0% of participants were women, and the mean body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) was 26.6± 4.1.

Results: IAF increased with age (ultrasound: r = 0.28; WC: r = 0.25; P < 0.001 for both). Higher IAF, as measured by ultrasound but not by WC, was independently associated with higher metabolic risk factors. The correlation coefficients between IAF measured by ultrasound and plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triacylglycerol were 0.13, 0.16, -0.13, and 0.25, respectively (all P < 0.001; adjusted for age, sex, and BMI). The corresponding coefficients for IAF measured by WC were 0.17 (P < 0.001) and 0.01, -0.06, and 0.05 (all NS).

Conclusions: These results confirm the findings of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging investigations. When IAF is measured by ultrasound, the associations are more pronounced than when WC measurements are used and are independent of BMI. This suggests that IAF can be more reliably assessed by ultrasound measurements than by WC measurements.

Key Words: Ultrasonography • intraabdominal fat • waist circumference • metabolic syndrome • Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART) study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. L'Abee, P. J. Sauer, M. Damen, J.-P. Rake, H. Cats, and R. P Stolk
Cohort Profile: The GECKO Drenthe study, overweight programming during early childhood
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 486 - 489.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. M. de Vos, M. Prokop, C. J. Roos, M. F.L. Meijs, Y. T. van der Schouw, A. Rutten, P. M. Gorter, M.-J. Cramer, P. A. Doevendans, B. J. Rensing, et al.
Peri-coronary epicardial adipose tissue is related to cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcification in post-menopausal women
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 777 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. S. Vlachos, A. Hatziioannou, A. Perelas, and D. N. Perrea
Sonographic Assessment of Regional Adiposity
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1545 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Ferrannini, B. Balkau, S. W. Coppack, J. M. Dekker, A. Mari, J. Nolan, M. Walker, A. Natali, H. Beck-Nielsen, and the RISC Investigators
Insulin Resistance, Insulin Response, and Obesity as Indicators of Metabolic Risk
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 2885 - 2892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Beaser and P. Levy
A Work in Progress, but a Useful Construct
Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1812 - 1818.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
V. O. Palmieri, I. Grattagliano, P. Portincasa, and G. Palasciano
Systemic Oxidative Alterations Are Associated with Visceral Adiposity and Liver Steatosis in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
J. Nutr., December 1, 2006; 136(12): 3022 - 3026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. K. Kim, H. J. Kim, K. Y. Hur, S. H. Choi, C. W. Ahn, S. K. Lim, K. R. Kim, H. C. Lee, K. B. Huh, and B. S. Cha
Visceral fat thickness measured by ultrasonography can estimate not only visceral obesity but also risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2004; 79(4): 593 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition