AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, W. L
Right arrow Articles by Reis, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stone, W. L
Right arrow Articles by Reis, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stone, W. L
Right arrow Articles by Reis, B. B.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 4, 899-906, April 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Infants discriminate between natural and synthetic vitamin E1,2,3,4

William L Stone, Irene LeClair, Terry Ponder, Geraldine Baggs and Bridget Barrett Reis

1 From the Department of Pediatrics, James H Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN (WLS, IL, and TP), and the Pediatric Nutrition Research & Development Department, Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH (GB and BBR).

Background: In adults, RRR-{alpha}-tocopheryl acetate (natural vitaminE) has approximately twice the biological activity of all-rac-{alpha}-tocopherol (synthetic vitaminE). Similar studies have not been done in term infants.

Objective: We evaluated the vitaminE and antioxidant status of term infants fed formulas differing in the amount and form of vitaminE acetate.

Design: A controlled, blinded, multisite study was completed with 77 term infants randomly assigned to 1 of 3 different infant-formula groups. The HIGHNAT-E formula (n = 26) contained 20 IU RRR-{alpha}-tocopheryl acetate/L (14.5 mg/L), the LOWNAT-E formula (n = 25) contained 10 IU RRR-{alpha}-tocopheryl acetate/L (7.3 mg/L), and the SYN-E formula (n = 26) contained 13.5 IU synthetic all-rac-{alpha}-tocopheryl acetate/L (13.5 mg/L). A human milk–fed group (n = 29) served as a reference.

Results: Although the LOWNAT-E formula contained only one-half the concentration of {alpha}-tocopherol that the SYN-E formula did (7.3 compared with 13.5 mg/L), the infants fed the LOWNAT-E formula had plasma {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations that were not significantly different from those of the infants fed the SYN-E formula. However, {alpha}-tocopherol intakes in the study population, when expressed as mg 2R-tocopherol isomers consumed/d, correlated with plasma {alpha}-tocopherol (r = 0.20, P = 0.02) and the ratio of plasma {alpha}-tocopherol to lipids (r = 0.19, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in antioxidant status between the 3 groups, but the LOWNAT-E group showed a trend toward lower plasma isoprostanes.

Conclusions: This study supports the new definition for vitaminE given in the 2000 Dietary Reference Intakes and suggests that infants discriminate between RRR-{alpha}-tocopheryl acetate and all-rac-{alpha}-tocopheryl acetate. All 3 infant formulas supported adequate vitaminE status.

Key Words: Infants • biological activity • RRR-{alpha}-tocopherol • all-rac-{alpha}-tocopherol • {gamma}-tocopherol • plasma tocopherols • red blood cell tocopherols • 8-epi-prostaglandin F2{alpha} isoprostanes







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition