|
|
||||||||
Original Research Communication |
1 From the Diet and Human Performance Laboratory (JMC), the Food Surveys Research Group (LAI and AJM), and the Biometrical Consulting Service (BTV), US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Beltsville, MD.
Background: National surveys of food intake rely on the 24-h dietary recall method for assessing the nutrient intakes of Americans.
Objectives: This observational validation study was conducted under controlled conditions to test the effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) 5-step multiple-pass method for dietary recall; to test the ability of normal weight, overweight, and obese women to recall food intake; and to test the accuracy of macronutrient recall.
Design: Women (n = 49) aged 2165 y with a body mass index (in kg/m2) of 2045 selected all meals and snacks for 1 d from a wide variety of foods. A 24-h dietary recall with the use of the USDA 5-step multiple-pass method was administered by telephone the following day. Analysis of variance and covariance tested the overall accuracy of recall and the effect of BMI on dietary recall.
Results: As a population, the women overestimated their energy and carbohydrate intakes by 810%. No significant differences between mean actual and recalled intakes of energy and the macronutrients were observed in the obese women. Normal-weight and overweight women significantly (P < 0.01) overestimated their energy, protein, and carbohydrate intakes. Recalled fat intake was not significantly different from actual intake in women across the BMI range studied.
Conclusions: The USDA 5-step multiple-pass method effectively assessed mean energy intake within 10% of mean actual intake on the previous day. Obese women more accurately recalled food intake than did overweight and normal-weight women despite undereating on the day of the study.
Key Words: Food intake energy intake obesity dietary assessment 24-h dietary recall 5-step multiple-pass method US Department of Agriculture women
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J Moshfegh, D. G Rhodes, D. J Baer, T. Murayi, J. C Clemens, W. V Rumpler, D. R Paul, R. S Sebastian, K. J Kuczynski, L. A Ingwersen, et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 324 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Beasley, W. T. Riley, A. Davis, and J. Singh Evaluation of a PDA-based Dietary Assessment and Intervention Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 27(2): 280 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. McNaughton, K. Ball, G. D. Mishra, and D. A. Crawford Dietary Patterns of Adolescents and Risk of Obesity and Hypertension J. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 138(2): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thorpe, M. C. Mojtahedi, K. Chapman-Novakofski, E. McAuley, and E. M. Evans A Positive Association of Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density with Dietary Protein Is Suppressed by a Negative Association with Protein Sulfur J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 80 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. McNaughton, K. Ball, D. Crawford, and G. D. Mishra An Index of Diet and Eating Patterns Is a Valid Measure of Diet Quality in an Australian Population J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 86 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Fulgoni III Limitations of Data on Fluid Intake J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2007; 26(suppl_5): 588S - 591S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Gewa, S. P. Murphy, and C. G. Neumann Out-of-Home Food Intake Is Often Omitted from Mothers' Recalls of School Children's Intake in Rural Kenya J. Nutr., September 1, 2007; 137(9): 2154 - 2159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K Kant and B. I Graubard Secular trends in patterns of self-reported food consumption of adult Americans: NHANES 1971-1975 to NHANES 1999-2002. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2006; 84(5): 1215 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Pierce, L. Natarajan, S. Sun, W. Al-Delaimy, S. W. Flatt, S. Kealey, C. L. Rock, C. A. Thomson, V. A. Newman, C. Ritenbaugh, et al. Increases in Plasma Carotenoid Concentrations in Response to a Major Dietary Change in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1886 - 1892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Blanton, A. J. Moshfegh, D. J. Baer, and M. J. Kretsch The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method Accurately Estimates Group Total Energy and Nutrient Intake J. Nutr., October 1, 2006; 136(10): 2594 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Demark-Wahnefried, E. C. Clipp, M. C. Morey, C. F. Pieper, R. Sloane, D. C. Snyder, and H. J. Cohen Lifestyle Intervention Development Study to Improve Physical Function in Older Adults With Cancer: Outcomes From Project LEAD J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2006; 24(21): 3465 - 3473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Shai, B. A. Rosner, D. R. Shahar, H. Vardi, A. B. Azrad, A. Kanfi, D. Schwarzfuchs, and D. Fraser Dietary Evaluation and Attenuation of Relative Risk: Multiple Comparisons between Blood and Urinary Biomarkers, Food Frequency, and 24-Hour Recall Questionnaires: the DEARR Study J. Nutr., March 1, 2005; 135(3): 573 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |