|
|
||||||||
Original Research Communication |
1 From the Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity (ZM, IP, MEC, and LMG-S) and the Division of Laboratory Sciences (EWG), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.
Background: Hemoglobin and erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP) tests are commonly used to screen for iron deficiency. However, little research has been done to systematically evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these 2 tests.
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of hemoglobin and EP measurements in predicting iron deficiency in preschool children and in women of childbearing age.
Design: We examined data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 2613 children aged 15 y and n = 5175 nonpregnant women aged 1549 y). Children or women with blood lead
10 µg/dL were excluded from this study. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of hemoglobin and EP measurements in screening for iron deficiency, defined as having abnormal values for
2 of the following 3 indexes: mean cell volume, transferrin saturation, and serum ferritin.
Results: The ROC performance of EP was consistently better than that of hemoglobin for detecting iron deficiency in preschool children. However, in nonpregnant women, we found no significant difference between EP and hemoglobin in ROC performance for detecting iron deficiency. We observed the same results when we stratified the analyses by sex and race of the children and by race of the women.
Conclusions: For children aged 15 y, EP is a better screening tool for iron deficiency than is hemoglobin. However, for nonpregnant women, EP and hemoglobin have similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting iron deficiency.
Key Words: Iron deficiency hemoglobin erythrocyte protoporphyrin zinc protoporphyrin mean cell volume transferrin saturation serum ferritin receiver operating characteristic curve preschool children women iron deficiency anemia
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Crowell, A. M. Ferris, R. J. Wood, P. Joyce, and H. Slivka Comparative Effectiveness of Zinc Protoporphyrin and Hemoglobin Concentrations in Identifying Iron Deficiency in a Group of Low-Income, Preschool-Aged Children: Practical Implications of Recent Illness Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): 224 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Blanck, M. E Cogswell, C. Gillespie, and M. Reyes Iron supplement use and iron status among US adults: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2005; 82(5): 1024 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Traxler and J. T. Benjamin The Incidence, Treatment, and Follow-up of Iron Deficiency in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Clinic Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 44(4): 333 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B Zimmermann, L. Molinari, F. Staubli-Asobayire, S. Y Hess, N. Chaouki, P. Adou, and R. F Hurrell Serum transferrin receptor and zinc protoporphyrin as indicators of iron status in African children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2005; 81(3): 615 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. White Anemia Is a Poor Predictor of Iron Deficiency Among Toddlers in the United States: For Heme the Bell Tolls Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): 315 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |