AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mihalynuk, T. V
Right arrow Articles by Coombs, J. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mihalynuk, T. V
Right arrow Articles by Coombs, J. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mihalynuk, T. V
Right arrow Articles by Coombs, J. B
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 5, 1330-1336, May 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Original Research Communication

Self-reported nutrition proficiency is positively correlated with the perceived quality of nutrition training of family physicians in Washington State1,2,3

Tanis V Mihalynuk, Craig S Scott and John B Coombs

1 From the University of Washington, Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health and Community Medicine (TVM), and the Departments of Medical Education (CSS) and Family Medicine (JBC), School of Medicine, Seattle.

Background: Despite concerted scientific, educational, and congressional calls to increase nutrition coverage in medicine for more than half a century, most graduating medical students report an inadequate quality and quantity of nutrition training. Furthermore, practicing physicians report a lack of confidence and related proficiency in nutrition counseling skills because of inadequate training. Assessment of nutrition proficiency and related training of practicing physicians may support the prioritization of nutrition topics to be included in medical education.

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that the perceived adequacy of nutrition training (quality and quantity) of family physicians in Washington State is positively correlated with self-reported nutrition proficiency in 5 nutrition factors determined after confirmatory factor analysis.

Design: A randomized mail survey method (n = 778 possible respondents), which involved one mass-mailing follow-up, was used.

Results: A 39.3% response rate was achieved (n = 306 respondents). The 31-item questionnaire was reduced to 5 factors, explaining 48.5% of the total variance ({alpha} = 0.916). Perceived quality (poor to excellent) of nutrition training was positively correlated with self-reported nutrition proficiency scores for all 5 factors (P < 0.01). No significant differences were noted between zip code or sex and mean nutrition proficiency scores for all 5 factors.

Conclusion: The examination of correlations between perceived quality of education and self-reported proficiency may be a useful gauge of effectiveness of nutrition training in medicine. Prioritization of nutrition information based on proficiency levels, including information on complementary and alternative medicines and nutritional management of disease, merits further investigation.

Key Words: Nutrition proficiency • medical-nutrition training • medical students • family physicians • Washington Academy of Family Physicians




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. L. Vetter, S. J. Herring, M. Sood, N. R. Shah, and A. L. Kalet
What Do Resident Physicians Know about Nutrition? An Evaluation of Attitudes, Self-Perceived Proficiency and Knowledge
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 27(2): 287 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
T. V. Mihalynuk, J. B. Coombs, M. E. Rosenfeld, C. S. Scott, and R. H. Knopp
Survey Correlations: Proficiency and Adequacy of Nutrition Training of Medical Students
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 59 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. C. Oh, S. A. A. Beresford, and W. E. Lafferty
The Fish in Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease (FISH) Survey--Primary Care Physicians and {omega}3 Fatty Acid Prescribing Behaviors
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2006; 19(5): 459 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. M Adams, K. C Lindell, M. Kohlmeier, and S. H Zeisel
Status of nutrition education in medical schools.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 941S - 944S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S. J Genuis
Nutritional transition: a determinant of global health
J Epidemiol Community Health, August 1, 2005; 59(8): 615 - 617.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Physiol. Educ.Home page
B. Martin, J. B. Watkins III, and J. W. Ramsey
Evaluating metabolic syndrome in a medical physiology laboratory
Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2004; 28(4): 195 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition