AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Zuckerman, P. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Zuckerman, P. A
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Byrne, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Zuckerman, P. A
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 77, No. 6, 1368-1373, June 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Influence of distribution of lean body mass on resting metabolic rate after weight loss and weight regain: comparison of responses in white and black women1,2,3,4

Nuala M Byrne, Roland L Weinsier, Gary R Hunter, Renee Desmond, Mindy A Patterson, Betty E Darnell and Paul A Zuckerman

1 From the Departments of Nutrition Sciences (NMB, RLW, MAP, and PAZ) and Human Studies (GRH), the Biostatistics Unit (RD), the General Clinical Research Center (BED), and the Clinical Nutrition Research Center (RLW, GRH, and RD), University of Alabama at Birmingham, and the School of Human Movement Studies, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (NMB).

Background: Little is known about the effect of weight change on regional lean body mass (LBM) distribution or on racial differences in resting metabolic rate (RMR).

Objective: The study compared total and regional LBM patterns in white and black women after weight loss and regain and assessed the influence of regional LBM on variances in RMR.

Design: Eighteen white and 22 black women who did not differ in age, weight, and height were studied 3 times: in the overweight state, after weight reduction to the normal-weight state, and after 1 y without intervention. Total and regional lean and fat masses were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Results: White and black women did not differ significantly in mean (± SD) weight loss (13.4 ± 3.6 and 12.7 ± 3.2 kg, respectively) and regain (6.1 ± 5.5 and 6.4 ± 5.4 kg, respectively). Black subjects had significantly less trunk LBM and significantly more limb LBM at each time point (P < 0.05). In both races, weight regain was associated with significant increases in limb LBM (P < 0.05) but not in trunk LBM (P = 0.21). RMR, adjusted for total LBM and fat mass, was significantly higher in white women after weight loss (P < 0.01) and regain (P < 0.01). However, no racial difference was found when RMR was adjusted for LBM distribution.

Conclusions: In both races, trunk LBM decreased with weight loss and remained lower, despite significant weight regain, which potentially reflected decreased organ mass. Regional LBM distribution explained the racial difference in RMR.

Key Words: Overweight • obesity • weight loss • body composition • resting metabolic rate • lean body mass • fat mass • regional distribution • African American women


Related articles in AJCN:

The whole is greater than the weighted average of its parts
David B Allison
AJCN 2003 77: 1348-1349. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Bosy-Westphal, E. Kossel, K. Goele, W. Later, B. Hitze, U. Settler, M. Heller, C.-C. Gluer, S. B Heymsfield, and M. J Muller
Contribution of individual organ mass loss to weight loss-associated decline in resting energy expenditure
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2009; 90(4): 993 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. M. Byrne, A. P. Hills, G. R. Hunter, R. L. Weinsier, and Y. Schutz
Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2005; 99(3): 1112 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. B Allison
The whole is greater than the weighted average of its parts
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2003; 77(6): 1348 - 1349.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition