|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris (CF, EG, J-LD, JL, and J-YF), and the Service de Pneumologie et Réanimation, Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, Paris (CF).
Background: Usual equations for predicting resting energy expenditure (REE) are not appropriate for critically ill patients, and indirect calorimetry criteria render its routine use difficult.
Objective: Variables that might influence the REE of mechanically ventilated patients were evaluated to establish a predictive relation between these variables and REE.
Design: The REE of 70 metabolically stable, mechanically ventilated patients was prospectively measured by indirect calorimetry and calculated with the use of standard predictive models (Harris and Benedicts equations corrected for hypermetabolism factors). Patient data that might influence REE were assessed, and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine the relations between measured REE and these data. Measured and calculated REE were compared by using the Bland-Altman method.
Results: Multivariate analysis retained 4 independent variables defining REE: body weight (r2 = 0.14, P < 0.0001), height (r2 = 0.11, P = 0.0002), minute ventilation (r2 = 0.04, P = 0.01), and body temperature (r2 = 0.07, P = 0.002): REE (kcal/d) = 8 x body weight + 14 x height + 32 x minute ventilation + 94 x body temperature - 4834. REE calculated with this equation was well correlated with measured REE (r2 = 0.61, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots showed a mean bias approaching zero, and the limits of agreement between measured and predicted REE were clinically acceptable.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that REE estimated on the basis of body weight, height, minute ventilation, and body temperature is clinically more relevant than are the usual predictive equations for metabolically stable, mechanically ventilated patients.
Key Words: Resting energy expenditure mechanical ventilation indirect calorimetry nutrition metabolism intensive care
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Hoher, P. J. Z. Teixeira, F. Hertz, and J. da S. Moreira A Comparison Between Ventilation Modes: How Does Activity Level Affect Energy Expenditure Estimates? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, March 1, 2008; 32(2): 176 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Zijlstra, S. M. t. Dam, P. J. M. Hulshof, C. Ram, G. Hiemstra, and N. M. de Roos 24-Hour Indirect Calorimetry in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 250 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Frankenfield Energy Expenditure and Protein Requirements After Traumatic Injury Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fiaccadori, U. Maggiore, C. Rotelli, R. Giacosa, E. Picetti, E. Parenti, T. Meschi, L. Borghi, D. Tagliavini, and A. Cabassi Effects of different energy intakes on nitrogen balance in patients with acute renal failure: a pilot study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 1976 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Barak Assessment of resting energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated patients Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2004; 79(2): 341 - 342. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |