AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox-Reijven, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soeters, P. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox-Reijven, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soeters, P. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cox-Reijven, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soeters, P. B
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1111-1119, December 2003
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Bioelectrical impedance measurements in patients with gastrointestinal disease: validation of the spectrum approach and a comparison of different methods for screening for nutritional depletion1,2,3

Petronella LM Cox-Reijven, Bernard van Kreel and Peter B Soeters

1 From the Departments of Dietetics (PLMC-R), Clinical Chemistry (BVK), and Surgery (PBS), University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Background: Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) may be of value in identifying patients with nutritional depletion.

Objective: The primary aim of the study was to assess the validity of BIS in patients with gastrointestinal disease. The secondary aim was to compare different screening methods for identifying nutritionally depleted patients.

Design: In 70 patients with gastrointestinal disease, BIS measurements were performed and fluid compartments were calculated from extrapolated resistance (R) values of extracellular (RECW) and intracellular (RICW) water based on mixture equations. Results were compared with total body water and ECW, which were measured by dilution methods. Patients were classified as depleted if their actual fat-free mass (FFM) was <90% of their ideal FFM (iFFM). Different screening approaches for depletion were compared: the impedance vector method and the resistance index (RI) in relation to iFFM (RI/iFFM).

Results: Total body water and ICW were largely underestimated (4 L) in the not-depleted patients but not in the depleted patients. In both groups, ECW was slightly overestimated (0.6–0.7 L). The critical frequency was 60% higher and the membrane capacitance was 40% lower in the depleted than in the not-depleted patients. The impedance vector method failed to identify depleted patients, whereas the proposed ratio at R50 (R measured at 50 kHz) and Rinf (R at infinite frequency) resulted in comparable sensitivity (86%) and specificity (73–80%).

Conclusions: BIS measures of body fluids are influenced by the presence of depletion, probably because of alterations in the electric properties of the body at the cellular level. However, for screening purposes, the use of the ratio (L2/R)/iFFM at R50 and Rinf may be of value.

Key Words: Patients • gastrointestinal disease • depletion • body composition • bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy • BIS • total body water • extracellular water • intracellular water • screening




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
J. S. Powers, L. Choi, R. Bitting, N. Gupta, and M. Buchowski
Rapid Measurement of Total Body Water to Facilitate Clinical Decision Making in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, June 1, 2009; 64A(6): 664 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
C. Earthman, D. Traughber, J. Dobratz, and W. Howell
Bioimpedance Spectroscopy for Clinical Assessment of Fluid Distribution and Body Cell Mass
Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 389 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Sun, C. R French, G. R Martin, B. Younghusband, R. C Green, Y.-g. Xie, M. Mathews, J. R Barron, D. G Fitzpatrick, W. Gulliver, et al.
Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 74 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. Gupta, C. A Lammersfeld, J. L Burrows, S. L Dahlk, P. G Vashi, J. F Grutsch, S. Hoffman, and C. G Lis
Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1634 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
A. C. Buchholz, C. Bartok, and D. A. Schoeller
The Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Models in Clinical Populations
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 433 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Nutrition