| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS |
1 From the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (FM); the Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD (LY); and the Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom (AN).
Background: Compromised fetal growth may program chronic diseases of adulthood, and it has been suggested that maternal nutrition is a major determinant of fetal growth. We previously found no clinically significant associations between maternal diet and the size of the infant and placenta at birth in a large cohort of white women living in the United Kingdom.
Objective: The objective was to examine the relations between indexes of maternal nutritional status in pregnancy and the birth and placental weights of infants born at term.
Design: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 798 white nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies. Blood samples were obtained at 
16 and 28 wk of gestation.
Results: The concentration of most nutrients was not associated with pregnancy outcome. High retinol and hemoglobin concentrations in late, but not in early, pregnancy were strongly and independently associated with lower birth weight and smaller placental size at birth. Each 0.1-µmol increase in retinol predicted a 20.8-g (95% CI: 9.2, 32.5 g) decrease in birth weight (P < 0.001), and each 0.1-g/L increase in hemoglobin predicted a 61.5-g (95% CI: 28.5, 94.4 g) decrease in birth weight (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: We found negative associations between birth and placental weights and maternal retinol and hemoglobin concentrations. These relations may be causal or may reflect an underlying metabolic dysfunction, such as failure of plasma volume expansion. Our results provide no evidence that having high circulating nutrient concentrations, for example, through the use of supplements, would improve infant and placental growth.
Key Words: Pregnancy • nutrition • birth weight • placenta • smoking • human
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Ramon, F. Ballester, C. Iniguez, M. Rebagliato, M. Murcia, A. Esplugues, A. Marco, M. G. de la Hera, and J. Vioque Vegetable but Not Fruit Intake during Pregnancy Is Associated with Newborn Anthropometric Measures J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 561 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. T Masters, W. Jedrychowski, R. L Schleicher, W.-Y. Tsai, Y.-H. Tu, D. Camann, D. Tang, and F. P Perera Relation between prenatal lipid-soluble micronutrient status, environmental pollutant exposure, and birth outcomes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 1139 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M Bodnar and M. C Nelson Maternal nutrition and fetal growth: bias introduced because of an inappropriate statistical modeling strategy may explain null findings Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 525 - 526. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Mathews, L. Youngman, and A. Neil Reply to LM Bodnar and MC Nelson Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 526 - 527. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
