AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hix, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shankar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hix, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shankar, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hix, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shankar, A.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 79, No. 1, 93-98, January 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for the detection of retinol-binding protein1,2,3

John Hix, Carolina Martinez, Ian Buchanan, Jeff Morgan, Milton Tam and Anuraj Shankar

1 From the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Seattle (JH, JM, and MT); the Institute of Nutrition for Central America and Panama, Guatemala City (CM); Vista Diagnostics, Kirkland, WA (IB); the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore (AS); and Helen Keller Worldwide, Jakarta, Indonesia (AS).

Background: Retinol-binding protein (RBP) was chosen as a surrogate marker for retinol because of the close correspondence between retinol and RBP.

Objective: To meet the need for rapid, cost-effective determination of vitamin A status in populations, a quantitative enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of RBP was developed.

Design: The resulting RBP EIA, a competitive assay, uses RBP adsorbed to microtest strip wells to compete with RBP in serum. The assay takes {approx}40 min.

Results: With a reference panel of sera, test accuracy was found to be within 4% of expected values through the calibrated range of 0.48–1.92 µmol RBP/L (10–40 µg RBP/mL). Intraassay and interassay variability averaged 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively. Specificity testing showed no interference from other serum proteins, prealbumin, rheumatoid factor, bilirubin, estrogen, or C-reactive protein. The RBP EIA provided linear results between 0.43 and 1.80 µmol RBP/L (9 and 38 µg RBP/mL). Preliminary laboratory evaluations indicated that the RBP EIA correlates well with radial immunodiffusion for RBP and with HPLC for retinol, the current reference standard. A field evaluation in a population at risk for vitamin A deficiency (VAD) resulted in close correlation between RBP EIA measures and retinol measures by HPLC (R2 = 0.82).

Conclusions: The RBP EIA is as reliable in estimating VAD as is HPLC retinol. After successful validations, the test should enable public health authorities to rapidly monitor VAD and track vitamin A status in populations.

Key Words: Retinol-binding protein • vitamin A deficiency • enzyme immunoassay • vitamin A status • serum retinol




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Fujita, E. Brindle, J. Shofer, P. Ndemwa, Y. Kombe, B. Shell-Duncan, and K. A. O'Connor
Retinol-Binding Protein Stability in Dried Blood Spots
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1972 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition