AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pittler, M. H
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pittler, M. H
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pittler, M. H
Right arrow Articles by Ernst, E.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 79, No. 4, 529-536, April 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


REVIEW ARTICLE

Dietary supplements for body-weight reduction: a systematic review1,2

Max H Pittler and Edzard Ernst

1 From Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Background: Compliance with conventional weight-management programs is notoriously poor, and a plethora of over-the-counter slimming aids are sold with claims of effectiveness.

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the evidence from rigorous clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of dietary supplements in reducing body weight.

Design: The study was a systematic review. Literature searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, Amed, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library until March 2003. Hand searches of medical journals, the authors’ own files, and bibliographies of identified articles were conducted. There were no restrictions regarding the language of publication. The screening of studies, selection, validation, data extraction, and the assessment of methodologic quality were performed independently by the 2 reviewers. To be included, trials were required to be randomized and double-blind. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of dietary supplements were included if they were based on the results of randomized, double-blind trials.

Results: Five systematic reviews and meta-analyses and 25 additional trials were included and reviewed. Data on the following dietary supplements were identified: chitosan, chromium picolinate, Ephedra sinica, Garcinia cambogia, glucomannan, guar gum, hydroxy-methylbutyrate, plantago psyllium, pyruvate, yerba maté, and yohimbe. The reviewed studies provide some encouraging data but no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that any specific dietary supplement is effective for reducing body weight. The only exceptions are E. sinica– and ephedrine-containing supplements, which have been associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

Conclusions: The evidence for most dietary supplements as aids in reducing body weight is not convincing. None of the reviewed dietary supplements can be recommended for over-the-counter use.

Key Words: Overweight • obesity • weight reduction • complementary medicine • alternative medicine • herbal medicine • dietary supplements • chitosan • guar • chromium • ephedra • psyllium • garcinia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
G. A. Bray and F. L. Greenway
Pharmacological Treatment of the Overweight Patient
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2007; 59(2): 151 - 184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. W Anderson, S. M Schwartz, J. Hauptman, M. Boldrin, M. Rossi, V. Bansal, and C. A Hale
Low-Dose Orlistat Effects on Body Weight of Mildly to Moderately Overweight Individuals: A 16 Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2006; 40(10): 1717 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. M. Larsen, S. Toubro, O. Gudmundsen, and A. Astrup
Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for 1 y does not prevent weight or body fat regain
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 606 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. A Lawlor and N. Chaturvedi
Treatment and prevention of obesity--are there critical periods for intervention?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 35(1): 3 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Klein, L. E. Burke, G. A. Bray, S. Blair, D. B. Allison, X. Pi-Sunyer, Y. Hong, and R. H. Eckel
Clinical Implications of Obesity With Specific Focus on Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2952 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition