AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rolland, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Vellas, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rolland, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Vellas, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rolland, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Vellas, B.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 79, No. 4, 552-557, April 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Muscle strength in obese elderly women: effect of recreational physical activity in a cross-sectional study1,2,3

Yves Rolland, Valérie Lauwers-Cances, Marco Pahor, Judith Fillaux, Hélène Grandjean and Bruno Vellas

1 From the Service de Médecine Interne et de Gérontologie Clinique, Hôpital La Grave-Casselardit, Toulouse, France (YR and BV); the Laboratoire d’Épidémiologie et Santé Communautaire, Faculté de Médecine, Toulouse, France (VL-C, JF, and HG); and the Sticht Center on Aging, Section on Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (YR and MP).

Background: Muscle strength (MS) may be impaired in obese persons, and this impairment may be a consequence of both obesity and low physical fitness.

Objective: We investigated whether MS differed between obese [body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) > 29], normal-weight (BMI = 24–29), and lean (BMI < 24) elderly subjects and compared the MS of sedentary and active subjects according to their BMI group.

Design: The study included 215 obese [ SD) age: 80.0 ± 3.5 y; BMI: 31.9 ± 2.6], 630 normal-weight (age: 80.2 ± 3.7 y; BMI: 26.3 ± 1.4), and 598 lean (age: 80.7 ± 3.5 y; BMI: 21.6 ± 1.8) women with good functional ability. A cross-sectional design was used. Anthropometric measures (weight, height); measures of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), isometric knee and elbow extension (by statergometer), and isometric handgrip strength (by dynamometer); and data on health status and self-reported recreational physical activity (RPA: walking, gymnastics, cycling, swimming, gardening) were collected.

Results: Absolute (unadjusted) MS was higher in obese than in lean women (P < 0.01), except for handgrip strength (P > 0.05). When adjusted for age, height, RPA, pain, depression, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass, MS did not differ significantly between obese, normal-weight, and lean subjects, except for knee extension (significant interaction effect with RPA; P = 0.01). With increasing BMI, lower limb strength did not change in the sedentary women but increased in active (>= 1 h/wk in >= 1 RPA for >= 1 mo) women. All adjusted MS measures in active participants were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those in their sedentary peers.

Conclusion: The adjusted MS of elderly women is not associated with obesity but is higher in active subjects than in sedentary ones, especially in the lower limbs of obese subjects.

Key Words: Muscle strength • muscle mass • obesity • physical function • physical activity • body composition • elderly




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
Y. M. Rolland, H. M. Perry III, P. Patrick, W. A. Banks, and J. E. Morley
Loss of Appendicular Muscle Mass and Loss of Muscle Strength in Young Postmenopausal Women
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., March 1, 2007; 62(3): 330 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition