HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, A. Articles by Heymsfield, S. B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jones, A., Jr Articles by Heymsfield, S. B Agricola Articles by Jones, A. Articles by Heymsfield, S. B

Body-composition differences between African American and white women: relation to resting energy requirements^1,2,3

¹ From the Department of Medicine, Obesity Research Center, St Luke’s—Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York

Background: Body composition differs between African American (AA) and white women, and the resting metabolic rate (RMR) is likely to be lower in AA women than in white women.

Objective: We tested 2 hypotheses: that AA women have a greater proportion of low-metabolic-rate skeletal muscle (SM) and bone than do white women and that between-race musculoskeletal differences are a function of body weight.

Design: Hypothesis 1 was tested by comparing SM, bone, adipose tissue, and high-metabolic-rate residual mass across 22 pairs of matched AA and white women. Magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to partition weight into 4 components, and RMR was both calculated from tissue-organ mass and measured. Hypothesis 2 was evaluated by measuring SM, bone, fat, and residual mass in 521 AA and white women with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry alone.

Results: Hypothesis 1: AA women had greater SM ( ± SD group difference: 1.52 ± 2.48 kg; P < 0.01) and musculoskeletal mass (1.72 ± 2.66 kg; P < 0.01) than did white women. RMR calculated from body composition and measured RMR did not differ; RMR estimated by both approaches tended to be lower (160 kJ/d) in AA women than in white women. Hypothesis 2: SM was significantly correlated with weight, height, age, and race x weight interaction; greater SM in the AA women was a function of body weight.

Conclusions: Lower RMRs in AA women than in white women are related to corresponding differences in the proportions of heat-producing tissues and organs, and these race-related body-composition differences increase as a function of body weight.

Key Words: Energy requirements • resting metabolic rate • obesity • nutritional assessment

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. S Bhopal and S. B Rafnsson Could mitochondrial efficiency explain the susceptibility to adiposity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in South Asian populations? Int. J. Epidemiol., May 7, 2009; (2009) dyp202v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Heymsfield, T. Chirachariyavej, I. J. Rhyu, C. Roongpisuthipong, M. Heo, and A. Pietrobelli Differences between brain mass and body weight scaling to height: potential mechanism of reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure of taller adults J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 40 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Prior, S. M. Roth, X. Wang, C. Kammerer, I. Miljkovic-Gacic, C. H. Bunker, V. W. Wheeler, A. L. Patrick, and J. M. Zmuda Genetic and environmental influences on skeletal muscle phenotypes as a function of age and sex in large, multigenerational families of African heritage J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1121 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Silva, J. Wang, R. N. Pierson Jr, Z. Wang, S. B. Heymsfield, L. B. Sardinha, and S. Heshka Extracellular water: greater expansion with age in African Americans J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2005; 99(1): 261 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]