AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJCN
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butte, N. F
Right arrow Articles by O’Brian Smith, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butte, N. F
Right arrow Articles by O’Brian Smith, E
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Butte, N. F
Right arrow Articles by O’Brian Smith, E
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 79, No. 6, 1078-1087, June 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Energy requirements during pregnancy based on total energy expenditure and energy deposition1,2,3,4

Nancy F Butte, William W Wong, Margarita S Treuth, Kenneth J Ellis and E O’Brian Smith

1 From the US Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.

Background: Energy requirements during pregnancy remain controversial because of uncertainties regarding maternal fat deposition and reductions in physical activity.

Objective: This study was designed to estimate the energy requirements of healthy underweight, normal-weight, and overweight pregnant women and to explore energetic adaptations to pregnancy.

Design: The energy requirements of 63 women [17 with a low body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2), 34 with a normal BMI, and 12 with a high BMI] were estimated at 0, 9, 22, and 36 wk of pregnancy and at 27 wk postpartum. Basal metabolic rate (BMR) was measured by calorimetry, total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water, and activity energy expenditure (AEE) as TEE – BMR. Energy deposition was calculated from changes in body protein and fat. Energy requirements equaled the sum of TEE and energy deposition.

Results: BMR increased gradually throughout pregnancy at a mean (±SD) rate of 10.7 ± 5.4 kcal/gestational week, whereas TEE increased by 5.2 ± 12.8 kcal/gestational week, which indicated a slight decrease in AEE. Energy costs of pregnancy depended on BMI group. Although total protein deposition did not differ significantly by BMI group (mean for the 3 groups: 611 g protein), FM deposition did (5.3, 4.6, and 8.4 kg FM in the low-, normal-, and high-BMI groups; P = 0.02). Thus, energy costs differed significantly by BMI group (P = 0.02). In the normal-BMI group, energy requirements increased negligibly in the first trimester, by 350 kcal/d in the second trimester, and by 500 kcal/d in the third trimester.

Conclusion: Extra energy intake is required by healthy pregnant women to support adequate gestational weight gain and increases in BMR, which are not totally offset by reductions in AEE.

Key Words: Pregnancy • energy requirements • total energy expenditure • basal metabolic rate • activity • body composition


Related articles in AJCN:

Energy requirements during pregnancy: old questions and new findings
Elisabet Forsum
AJCN 2004 79: 933-934. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. M. DeMaio and C. E. F. Magann
Exercise and Pregnancy
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2009; 17(8): 504 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. Villamor, P. Sparen, and S. Cnattingius
Risk of Oral Clefts in Relation to Prepregnancy Weight Change and Interpregnancy Interval
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 167(11): 1305 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. Arumugam, D. Fleenor, and M. Freemark
Lactogenic and Somatogenic Hormones Regulate the Expression of Neuropeptide Y and Cocaine- and Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript in Rat Insulinoma (INS-1) Cells: Interactions with Glucose and Glucocorticoids
Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 258 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Lof, H. Olausson, K. Bostrom, B. Janerot-Sjoberg, A. Sohlstrom, and E. Forsum
Changes in basal metabolic rate during pregnancy in relation to changes in body weight and composition, cardiac output, insulin-like growth factor I, and thyroid hormones and in relation to fetal growth
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2005; 81(3): 678 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. Forsum
Energy requirements during pregnancy: old questions and new findings
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 933 - 934.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition