HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cifuentes, M. Articles by Shapses, S. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cifuentes, M. Articles by Shapses, S. A Agricola Articles by Cifuentes, M. Articles by Shapses, S. A

Weight loss and calcium intake influence calcium absorption in overweight postmenopausal women^1,2,3

¹ From the Department of Nutritional Sciences (MC, CSR, SAS) and the Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences (MPF, RMS), Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and the Department of Surgery, St Peters University Hospital (REB), New Brunswick, NJ

Background: Weight loss (WL) reduces bone mass and increases fracture risk. Mechanisms regulating calcium metabolism during WL are unclear.

Objective: The objective was to assess the effect of 6 wk of WL at 2 different amounts of calcium intake [normal (NlCa): 1 g/d; high (HiCa): 1.8 g/d] on true fractional calcium absorption (TFCA), bone turnover, and bone-regulating hormones in overweight postmenopausal women.

Design: Seventy-three women (body mass index, 26.9 ± 1.9 kg/m²) were recruited either to consume a moderately energy-restricted diet (WL group) or to maintain their body weight [weight-maintenance (WM) group] and were randomly assigned to either the HiCa or the NlCa group in a double-blind manner. Subjects underwent weekly diet counseling, and measurements were taken at baseline and after 6 wk.

Results: Fifty-seven women completed the study and had a baseline TFCA of 24.9 ± 7.4%. Energy restriction significantly decreased the total calcium absorbed (P < 0.05) in the WL group (n = 32) compared with the WM group (n = 25; analysis of covariance). Regression analysis showed that a greater rate of weight loss suppressed TFCA and the total calcium absorbed (P < 0.05) in the HiCa group. The women in the NlCa WL group absorbed inadequate amounts of calcium (195 ± 49 mg/d), whereas the women in the HiCa WL group absorbed adequate amounts (348 ± 118 mg/d). Parathyroid hormone explained 22% of the variance in calcium absorbed in the NlCa group only.

Conclusions: We suggest that WL is associated with elevated calcium requirements that, if not met, could activate the calcium-parathyroid hormone axis to absorb more calcium. Normal intakes of calcium during energy restriction result in inadequate total calcium absorption and could ultimately compromise calcium balance and bone mass.

Key Words: Calcium absorption • bone turnover • diet • postmenopausal status • weight loss

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S Riedt, Y. Schlussel, N. von Thun, H. Ambia-Sobhan, T. Stahl, M P. Field, R. M Sherrell, and S. A Shapses Premenopausal overweight women do not lose bone during moderate weight loss with adequate or higher calcium intake Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 972 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Shapses and C. S. Riedt Bone, Body Weight, and Weight Reduction: What Are the Concerns? J. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 136(6): 1453 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]