AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, P. S.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 2, 333-336, August 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Adjusting body cell mass for size in women of differing nutritional status1,2,3

Jonathan CK Wells, Alexia J Murphy, Helen M Buntain, Ristan M Greer, Geoffrey J Cleghorn and Peter SW Davies

1 From the MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London (JCKW); the Children’s Nutrition Research Centre (AJM, GJC, and PSWD), Department of Paediatrics and Child Health (HMB, RMG, and GJC), University of Queensland, Royal Children’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia; and the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia (HMB)

Background: Body cell mass (BCM) may be estimated in clinical practice to assess functional nutritional status, eg, in patients with anorexia nervosa. Interpretation of the data, especially in younger patients who are still growing, requires appropriate adjustment for size. Previous investigations of this general issue have addressed chemical rather than functional components of body composition and have not considered patients at the extremes of nutritional status, in whom the ability to make longitudinal comparisons is of particular importance.

Objective: Our objective was to determine the power by which height should be raised to adjust BCM for height in women of differing nutritional status.

Design: BCM was estimated by 40K counting in 58 healthy women, 33 healthy female adolescents, and 75 female adolescents with anorexia nervosa. The relation between BCM and height was explored in each group by using log-log regression analysis.

Results: The powers by which height should be raised to adjust BCM were 1.73, 1.73, and 2.07 in the women, healthy female adolescents, and anorexic female adolescents, respectively. A simplified version of the index, BCM/height2, was appropriate for all 3 categories and was negligibly correlated with height.

Conclusions: In normal-weight women, the relation between height and BCM is consistent with that reported previously between height and fat-free mass. Although the consistency of the relation between BCM and fat-free mass decreases with increasing weight loss, the relation between height and BCM is not significantly different between normal-weight and underweight women. The index BCM/height2 is easy to calculate and applicable to both healthy and underweight women. This information may be helpful in interpreting body-composition data in clinical practice.

Key Words: Body composition • potassium counting • eating disorders • anorexia nervosa




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J. C K Wells and M. S Fewtrell
Is body composition important for paediatricians?
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 168 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition