AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, B. J
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, M. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, B. J
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, M. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Foster, B. J
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, M. B
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 4, 801-814, October 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


REVIEW ARTICLE

Measuring nutritional status in children with chronic kidney disease1,2,3

Bethany J Foster and Mary B Leonard

1 From the Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk of protein-energy malnutrition. Existing clinical practice guidelines recognize this and recommend specific methods to assess nutritional status in patients with CKD. This review summarizes the methods for nutritional assessment currently recommended in the United States for children with CKD and details the strengths and limitations of these techniques in the clinical setting. Dietary assessment, serum albumin, height, estimated dry weight, weight/height index, upper arm anthropometry, head circumference, and the protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance are reviewed. We also describe methods for body-composition assessment, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), total body potassium, densitometry, and in vivo neutron activation analysis, pointing out some advantages and disadvantages of each. In CKD, fluid overload is the most important factor leading to misinterpretation of nutritional assessment measures. Abnormalities in the distribution of fat and lean tissue may also compromise the interpretation of some anthropometric measures. In addition, metabolic abnormalities may influence the results obtained by some techniques. Issues specific to evaluating nutritional status in the pediatric population are also discussed, including normalization of nutritional measures to body size and sexual maturity. We stress the importance of expressing body-composition measures relative to height in a population in whom short stature is highly prevalent.

Key Words: Nutritional status • chronic renal insufficiency • assessment techniques • growth • malnutrition • reference values • methods




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
V. Lilleby
Review: Bone status in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, August 1, 2007; 16(8): 580 - 586.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. Z. Morgenstern, E. Wuhl, K. S. Nair, B. A. Warady, and F. Schaefer
Anthropometric Prediction of Total Body Water in Children Who Are on Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 285 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition