AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomerleau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Doucet, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomerleau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Doucet, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pomerleau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Doucet, E.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 5, 1230-1236, November 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Effects of exercise intensity on food intake and appetite in women1,2,3

Marjorie Pomerleau, Pascal Imbeault, Torrey Parker and Eric Doucet

1 From the School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa

Background: Increasing exercise intensity has been shown to reduce energy intake in men.

Objective: The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of exercise intensity on energy intake in women.

Design: Thirteen moderately active (peak oxygen uptake: 44.0 ± 4.7 mL · kg–1 · min–1) women [body mass index (in kg/m2): 22.2 ± 2.4; age: 22.2 ± 2.0 y] were subjected to 3 experimental conditions: control with no exercise and 2 equicaloric (350 kcal) low- (LIE) and high- (HIE) intensity exercise sessions at 40% and 70% of peak oxygen uptake, respectively. After each session, the participants ate ad libitum from buffet-type meals at lunch and dinner and ate snacks during the afternoon and evening. Visual analogue scales were used to rate appetite.

Results: More energy was ingested at lunchtime after the HIE session than after the control session (878 ± 309 and 751 ± 230 kcal, respectively; P = 0.02). Relative energy intake (postexercise energy intake corrected for the energy cost of exercise above the resting level) at lunch was lower after the LIE session than after the control session (530 ± 233 and 751 ± 230 kcal, respectively; P < 0.001) and was lower after the HIE session than after the control session (565 ± 301 and 751 ± 230 kcal, respectively; P < 0.01). Similarly, daily energy intake tended to increase during the HIE session relative to that during the control session. No treatment effect was found for appetite scores throughout the experiment.

Conclusion: The results suggest that HIE increases energy intake in women.

Key Words: Physical activity • energy intake • energy expenditure • appetite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. S Goldfield, C. Lorello, and E. Doucet
Methylphenidate reduces energy intake and dietary fat intake in adults: a mechanism of reduced reinforcing value of food?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 308 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. R. Broom, D. J. Stensel, N. C. Bishop, S. F. Burns, and M. Miyashita
Exercise-induced suppression of acylated ghrelin in humans
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2007; 102(6): 2165 - 2171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition