AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mølgaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Michaelsen, K. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mølgaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Michaelsen, K. F
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mølgaard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Michaelsen, K. F
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 5, 1422-1427, November 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Effect of habitual dietary calcium intake on calcium supplementation in 12–14-y-old girls1,2,3

Christian Mølgaard, Birthe L Thomsen and Kim F Michaelsen

1 From the Department of Human Nutrition and Centre for Advanced Food Studies, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark (CM and KFM), and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (now the Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society) (BLT)

Background: There is no agreement on how much calcium young girls need for optimal bone mineralization.

Objective: We evaluated whether the effect of calcium supplementation on whole-body bone mineral accretion depends on habitual calcium intake.

Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-y calcium intervention study of girls aged 12–14 y selected from a larger group according to habitual calcium intake: subgroup A (n = 60) habitually consumed 1000–1307 mg/d (40th–60th percentile), and subgroup B (n = 53) habitually consumed <713 mg/d (<20th percentile). The girls from each subgroup were randomly assigned to receive either 500 mg Ca/d or placebo. Whole-body bone mineral content (BMC), bone area (BA), bone mineral density (BMD), and BMC adjusted for BA, height, and weight (size-adjusted BMC) were measured at baseline and after 1 y.

Results: There was no significant effect modification of baseline habitual calcium intake on the relation between calcium supplementation and height, weight, BMC, size-adjusted BMC, BA, BMD, or alkaline phosphatase. Calcium supplementation had an effect on BMD (0.8%; P = 0.049) and tended to show signs of an effect on size-adjusted BMC (0.5%; P = 0.08).

Conclusion: A modest effect of calcium supplementation on BMD was shown. However, the effect was independent of habitual calcium intake.

Key Words: Young girls • bone mineral content • calcium intervention • habitual calcium intake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. K Lorenzen, C. Molgaard, K. F Michaelsen, and A. Astrup
Calcium supplementation for 1 y does not reduce body weight or fat mass in young girls
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2006; 83(1): 18 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Cheng, A. Lyytikainen, H. Kroger, C. Lamberg-Allardt, M. Alen, A. Koistinen, Q. J. Wang, M. Suuriniemi, H. Suominen, A. Mahonen, et al.
Effects of calcium, dairy product, and vitamin D supplementation on bone mass accrual and body composition in 10-12-y-old girls: a 2-y randomized trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2005; 82(5): 1115 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Molgaard, P. Kaestel, and K. F Michaelsen
Long-term calcium supplementation does not affect the iron status of 12-14-y-old girls
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2005; 82(1): 98 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition