AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tran, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hambidge, K M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tran, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hambidge, K M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tran, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hambidge, K M.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 6, 1570-1573, December 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Zinc absorption as a function of the dose of zinc sulfate in aqueous solution1,2,3

Cuong D Tran, Leland V Miller, Nancy F Krebs, Sian Lei and K Michael Hambidge

1 From the Section of Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver (CDT, LVM, NFK, SL, and KML); the Gastroenterology Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia (CDT)

Background: Zinc supplements are used extensively in medicine and research and for public health purposes in the prevention and treatment of zinc deficiency. However, little is known about the efficiency of zinc utilization after different doses.

Objective: The objective was to determine the relation between dose of aqueous zinc and absorbed zinc (AZ) in healthy adults.

Design: Eight healthy adults (3 men and 5 women) aged 33.8 ± 9.8 y ( ± SD) received 3 pairs of zinc doses (2 and 5, 10 and 15, and 20 and 30 mg) in random order in 3 phases (1 pair per phase). There was a 3-wk washout between phases. Aqueous zinc sulfate labeled with 70Zn or 68Zn was orally administered in the postabsorptive state on days 1 and 6, respectively; intravenous 67Zn was administered 1 h after the first oral zinc dose. Two urine samples were collected daily from days 3 to 15; zinc isotopic ratios were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) was determined by dual-isotope-tracer ratio; AZ was calculated by multiplying FAZ by dose.

Results: Mean (±SD) AZ values at doses of 2.2, 5.2, 10.4, 15.2, 20.3, and 30.1 mg ingested Zn were 1.6 ± 0.4, 3.5 ± 1.3, 7.4 ± 1.0, 9.5 ± 2.2, 11.0 ± 4.4, and 11.2 ± 2.1 mg, respectively. A saturable dose-response model, the Hill equation, was selected to model the relation of AZ to ingested zinc. Parameter estimation by nonlinear regression predicted a maximum zinc absorption of 13 mg for larger doses.

Conclusions: Increases in aqueous zinc doses >20 mg result in relatively small and progressively diminishing increases in AZ postabsorptively in healthy adults.

Key Words: Zinc absorption • zinc sulfate • aqueous solution




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. E Wuehler, F. Sempertegui, and K. H Brown
Dose-response trial of prophylactic zinc supplements, with or without copper, in young Ecuadorian children at risk of zinc deficiency
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 723 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. V. Miller, N. F. Krebs, and K. M. Hambidge
A Mathematical Model of Zinc Absorption in Humans As a Function of Dietary Zinc and Phytate
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 135 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
X.-Y. Sheng, K M. Hambidge, X.-X. Zhu, J.-X. Ni, K. B Bailey, R. S Gibson, and N. F Krebs
Major variables of zinc homeostasis in Chinese toddlers.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2006; 84(2): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition