AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lis, C. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lis, C. G
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lis, C. G
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 80, No. 6, 1634-1638, December 2004
© 2004 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer1,2,3

Digant Gupta, Carolyn A Lammersfeld, Jessica L Burrows, Sadie L Dahlk, Pankaj G Vashi, James F Grutsch, Sara Hoffman and Christopher G Lis

1 From Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL

Background: Phase angle, determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), detects changes in tissue electrical properties and has been found to be a prognostic indicator in several chronic conditions—such as HIV, liver cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer—and in patients receiving dialysis.

Objective: This study was conducted to investigate the prognostic role of phase angle in advanced colorectal cancer.

Design: We evaluated a case series of 52 patients with histologically confirmed stage IV colorectal cancer. BIA was conducted on all patients and phase angle was calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate the prognostic effect of phase angle independent of other clinical and nutritional variables.

Results: Patients with a phase angle ≤5.57 had a median survival of 8.6 mo (95% CI: 4.8, 12.4; n = 26), whereas those with a phase angle >5.57 had a median survival of 40.4 mo (95% CI: 21.9, 58.8; n = 26; P = 0.0001).

Conclusion: Phase angle is a prognostic indicator in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Similar studies of other cancer types with larger sample sizes are needed to further validate the prognostic significance of phase angle in cancer treatment settings.

Key Words: Advanced colorectal cancer • bioelectrical impedance analysis • phase angle • nutritional assessment • prognostic significance • survival




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
A. Bosy-Westphal, S. Danielzik, R.-P. Dorhofer, W. Later, S. Wiese, and M. J. Muller
Phase Angle From Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: Population Reference Values by Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 2006; 30(4): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Nutrition