AJCN EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Borrud, L. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Borrud, L. G
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Borrud, L. G
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 81, No. 5, 1018-1025, May 2005
© 2005 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults1,2,3,4

Dale A Schoeller, Frances A Tylavsky, David J Baer, William C Chumlea, Carrie P Earthman, Thomas Fuerst, Tamara B Harris, Steven B Heymsfield, Mary Horlick, Timothy G Lohman, Henry C Lukaski, John Shepherd, Roger M Siervogel and Lori G Borrud

1 From the Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison (DAS); Preventive Medicine, Health Science Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN (FAT); the Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD (DJB); the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD (LGB); the Lifespan Health Research Center, Department of Community Health, Wright State University School of Medicine, Kettering, OH (WCC and RMS); Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA (CPE); the University of California, San Francisco (TF); the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (TBH); the Obesity Research Center, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY (SBH and HM); the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (TGL); the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Grand Forks, ND (HCL); and Radiology, University of California, San Francisco (JS)

Background: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has become one of the most frequently used methods for estimating human body composition. Although the DXA technique has been validated for the measurement of fat-free mass and fat mass, differences in calibration between instruments produced by different manufacturers, as well as between different models produced by the same manufacturer, have been reported.

Objective: The objective was to compare the calibration of the QDR 4500A against criterion methods in a large heterogeneous population.

Design: DXA-derived body-composition data were obtained from 7 studies: 6 data sets were provided by the investigators, one of which was published. The data included fat mass and fat-free mass measured with a QDR 4500A and criteria measurements of body composition from total body water by dilution at 4 centers, densitometry from 1 center, and four-compartment analysis at 2 centers.

Results: In the cohort of 1195 subjects, 602 men and 593 women aged 19–82 y with a body mass index (in kg/m2) of 16–44, the fan-beam DXA overestimated fat-free mass (P < 0.05). A significant difference was observed in all 7 data sets, and the mean (±SE) was 5 ± 1%.

Conclusions: It is recommended that the lean soft tissue mass estimate with the fan-beam QDR 4500A be reduced by 5% and that for fat mass be increased by that same mass. This finding is particularly important because the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is using the QDR 4500A to assess body composition in a nationally representative sample of persons in the United States.

Key Words: Body composition • hydration • total body water




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. M Flegal, C. L Ogden, J. A Yanovski, D. S Freedman, J. A Shepherd, B. I Graubard, and L. G Borrud
High adiposity and high body mass index-for-age in US children and adolescents overall and by race-ethnic group
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2010; 91(4): 1020 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
J. S. Lee, M. Visser, F. A. Tylavsky, S. B. Kritchevsky, A. V. Schwartz, N. Sahyoun, T. B. Harris, A. B. Newman, and for the Health ABC Study
Weight Loss and Regain and Effects on Body Composition: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, January 1, 2010; 65A(1): 78 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
F. Fantin, V. D. Francesco, G. Fontana, A. Zivelonghi, L. Bissoli, E. Zoico, A. Rossi, R. Micciolo, O. Bosello, and M. Zamboni
Longitudinal Body Composition Changes in Old Men and Women: Interrelationships With Worsening Disability
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, December 1, 2007; 62(12): 1375 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society for Nutrition