AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, P. T
Right arrow Articles by Krauss, R. M
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 82, No. 1, 181-187, July 2005
© 2005 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Concordant lipoprotein and weight responses to dietary fat change in identical twins with divergent exercise levels 1 ,2 ,3

Paul T Williams, Patricia J Blanche, Robin Rawlings and Ronald M Krauss

1 From the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Donner Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (PTW and RMK), and the Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA (PJB, RR, and RMK)

Background: Individuals vary greatly in their lipoprotein responses to low-fat diets, with some of this variation being attributable to genes.

Objective: The purpose was to test the extent to which individual lipoprotein responses to diet can be attributed to genes in the presence of divergent exercise levels.

Design: Twenty-eight pairs of male monozygotic twins (one twin mostly sedentary, the other running an average of 50 km/wk more than the sedentary twin) went from a 6-wk 40%-fat diet to a 6-wk 20%-fat diet in a crossover design. The diets reduced fat primarily by reducing saturated and polyunsaturated fat (both from 14% to 4%) while increasing carbohydrate intake from 45% to 65%.

Results: Despite the twins' differences in physical activity, the dietary manipulation produced significantly correlated changes (P < 0.05) in the twins' total cholesterol (r = 0.56); LDL cholesterol (r = 0.70); large, buoyant LDL [Svedberg flotation rate (Sf) 7–12; r = 0.52]; apolipoprotein A-I (r = 0.49); lipoprotein(a) (r = 0.49); electrophoresis measurements of LDL-I (LDLs between 26 and 28.5 nm in diameter; r = 0.48), LDL-IIB (25.2–24.6 nm; r = 0.54), and LDL-IV (22–24.1 nm; r = 0.50); and body weight (r = 0.41). Replacing fats with carbohydrates significantly decreased the size and ultracentrifuge flotation rate of the major LDL and the LDL mass concentrations of large, buoyant LDL; LDL-I; HDL cholesterol; and apolipoprotein A-I and significantly increased concentrations of LDL-IIIA (24.7–25.5 nm) and lipoprotein(a).

Conclusions: Even in the presence of extreme differences in exercise, genes significantly affect changes in LDL, apolipoprotein A-I, lipoprotein(a), and body weight when dietary fats are replaced with carbohydrates.

Key Words: Twins • low-fat diet • high-carbohydrate diet • lipoproteins • lipoprotein(a) • physical activity • LDL subclasses • apolipoproteins • cholesterol







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society for Nutrition