AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ello-Martin, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Rolls, B. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ello-Martin, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Rolls, B. J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ello-Martin, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Rolls, B. J
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 82, No. 1, 236S-241S, July 2005
© 2005 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


Science-Based Solutions to Obesity: What Are the Roles of Academia, Government, Industry, and Health Care?

The influence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management 1,2,3,4

Julia A Ello-Martin, Jenny H Ledikwe and Barbara J Rolls

1 From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

ABSTRACT

The increase in the prevalence of obesity has coincided with an increase in portion sizes of foods both inside and outside the home, suggesting that larger portions may play a role in the obesity epidemic. Although it will be difficult to establish a causal relationship between increasing portion size and obesity, data indicate that portion size does influence energy intake. Several well-controlled, laboratory-based studies have shown that providing older children and adults with larger food portions can lead to significant increases in energy intake. This effect has been demonstrated for snacks and a variety of single meals and shown to persist over a 2-d period. Despite increases in intake, individuals presented with large portions generally do not report or respond to increased levels of fullness, suggesting that hunger and satiety signals are ignored or overridden. One strategy to address the effect of portion size is decreasing the energy density (kilojoules per gram; kilocalories per gram) of foods. Several studies have demonstrated that eating low-energy-dense foods (such as fruits, vegetables, and soups) maintains satiety while reducing energy intake. In a clinical trial, advising individuals to eat portions of low-energy-dense foods was a more successful weight loss strategy than fat reduction coupled with restriction of portion sizes. Eating satisfying portions of low-energy-dense foods can help to enhance satiety and control hunger while restricting energy intake for weight management.

Key Words: Portion size • energy density • energy intake • body weight • weight management • obesity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. M. Mathes, M. Ferrara, and N. E. Rowland
Cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonists reduce caloric intake by decreasing palatable diet selection in a novel dessert protocol in female rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): R67 - R75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. A McCaffrey, K. L Rennie, M. A Kerr, J. M Wallace, M. P Hannon-Fletcher, W A. Coward, S. A Jebb, and M B. E Livingstone
Energy density of the diet and change in body fatness from childhood to adolescence; is there a relation?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. S Blacklow
Actuarially speaking: an overview of life expectancy. What can we anticipate?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1560S - 1562S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. L Blackburn and K. A Wang
Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: results from the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS)
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 878S - 881S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. B. Ebbeling, E. Garcia-Lago, M. M. Leidig, L. G. Seger-Shippee, H. A. Feldman, and D. S. Ludwig
Altering Portion Sizes and Eating Rate to Attenuate Gorging During a Fast Food Meal: Effects on Energy Intake
Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 869 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. D. Gardner, A. Kiazand, S. Alhassan, S. Kim, R. S. Stafford, R. R. Balise, H. C. Kraemer, and A. C. King
Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women: The A TO Z Weight Loss Study: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, March 7, 2007; 297(9): 969 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
B. J Rolls, L. S Roe, and J. S Meengs
Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2006; 83(1): 11 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. L Blackburn and W A. Walker
Science-based solutions to obesity: what are the roles of academia, government, industry, and health care?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2005; 82(1): 207S - 210S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society for Nutrition