|
|
||||||||
Science-Based Solutions to Obesity: What Are the Roles of Academia, Government, Industry, and Health Care? |
1 From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
ABSTRACT
The increase in the prevalence of obesity has coincided with an increase in portion sizes of foods both inside and outside the home, suggesting that larger portions may play a role in the obesity epidemic. Although it will be difficult to establish a causal relationship between increasing portion size and obesity, data indicate that portion size does influence energy intake. Several well-controlled, laboratory-based studies have shown that providing older children and adults with larger food portions can lead to significant increases in energy intake. This effect has been demonstrated for snacks and a variety of single meals and shown to persist over a 2-d period. Despite increases in intake, individuals presented with large portions generally do not report or respond to increased levels of fullness, suggesting that hunger and satiety signals are ignored or overridden. One strategy to address the effect of portion size is decreasing the energy density (kilojoules per gram; kilocalories per gram) of foods. Several studies have demonstrated that eating low-energy-dense foods (such as fruits, vegetables, and soups) maintains satiety while reducing energy intake. In a clinical trial, advising individuals to eat portions of low-energy-dense foods was a more successful weight loss strategy than fat reduction coupled with restriction of portion sizes. Eating satisfying portions of low-energy-dense foods can help to enhance satiety and control hunger while restricting energy intake for weight management.
Key Words: Portion size energy density energy intake body weight weight management obesity
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Mathes, M. Ferrara, and N. E. Rowland Cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonists reduce caloric intake by decreasing palatable diet selection in a novel dessert protocol in female rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): R67 - R75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A McCaffrey, K. L Rennie, M. A Kerr, J. M Wallace, M. P Hannon-Fletcher, W A. Coward, S. A Jebb, and M B. E Livingstone Energy density of the diet and change in body fatness from childhood to adolescence; is there a relation? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1230 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S Blacklow Actuarially speaking: an overview of life expectancy. What can we anticipate? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1560S - 1562S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L Blackburn and K. A Wang Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: results from the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2007; 86(3): 878S - 881S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Ebbeling, E. Garcia-Lago, M. M. Leidig, L. G. Seger-Shippee, H. A. Feldman, and D. S. Ludwig Altering Portion Sizes and Eating Rate to Attenuate Gorging During a Fast Food Meal: Effects on Energy Intake Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 869 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Gardner, A. Kiazand, S. Alhassan, S. Kim, R. S. Stafford, R. R. Balise, H. C. Kraemer, and A. C. King Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN Diets for Change in Weight and Related Risk Factors Among Overweight Premenopausal Women: The A TO Z Weight Loss Study: A Randomized Trial JAMA, March 7, 2007; 297(9): 969 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J Rolls, L. S Roe, and J. S Meengs Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2006; 83(1): 11 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L Blackburn and W A. Walker Science-based solutions to obesity: what are the roles of academia, government, industry, and health care? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2005; 82(1): 207S - 210S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |