AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, M D.
Right arrow Articles by Frayn, K. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, M D.
Right arrow Articles by Frayn, K. N
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, M D.
Right arrow Articles by Frayn, K. N
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 82, No. 3, 559-567, September 2005
© 2005 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism1,2,3

M Denise Robertson, Alex S Bickerton, A Louise Dennis, Hubert Vidal and Keith N Frayn

1 From the Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (MDR, ASB, ALD, and KNF) and INSERM U-449/INRA-1235, Lyon, France (HV)

Background: Resistant starch may modulate insulin sensitivity, although the precise mechanism of this action is unknown.

Objective: We studied the effects of resistant starch on insulin sensitivity and tissue metabolism.

Design: We used a 4-wk supplementation period with 30 g resistant starch/d, compared with placebo, in 10 healthy subjects and assessed the results by using arteriovenous difference methods.

Results: When assessed by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, insulin sensitivity was higher after resistant starch supplementation than after placebo treatment (9.7 and 8.5 x 10–2 mg glucose · kg–1 · min–1 · (mU insulin/L)–1, respectively; P = 0.03); insulin sensitivity during the meal tolerance test (MTT) was 33% higher (P = 0.05). Forearm muscle glucose clearance during the MTT was also higher after resistant starch supplementation (P = 0.03) despite lower insulin concentrations (P = 0.02); glucose clearance adjusted for insulin was 44% higher. Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA; P = 0.02) and glycerol (P = 0.05) release were lower with resistant starch supplementation, although systemic NEFA concentrations were not significantly altered. Short-chain fatty acid concentrations (acetate and propionate) were higher during the MTT (P = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively), as was acetate uptake by adipose tissue (P = 0.03). Fasting plasma ghrelin concentrations were higher with resistant starch supplementation (2769 compared with 2062 pg/mL; P = 0.03), although postprandial suppression (40–44%) did not differ significantly. Measurements of gene expression in adipose tissue and muscle were uninformative, which suggests effects at a metabolic level. The resistant starch supplement was well tolerated.

Conclusion: These results suggest that dietary supplementation with resistant starch has the potential to improve insulin sensitivity. Further studies in insulin-resistant persons are needed.

Key Words: Ghrelin • lipolysis • short-chain fatty acids • skeletal muscle • insulin sensitivity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
M. V. Potenza and J. I. Mechanick
The Metabolic Syndrome: Definition, Global Impact, and Pathophysiology
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2009; 24(5): 560 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. C Nilsson, E. M Ostman, Y. Granfeldt, and I. M. Bjorck
Effect of cereal test breakfasts differing in glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates on daylong glucose tolerance in healthy subjects
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. O. Weickert and A. F. H. Pfeiffer
Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fiber Consumption and Prevention of Diabetes
J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 439 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Livesey, R. Taylor, T. Hulshof, and J. Howlett
Glycemic response and health a systematic review and meta-analysis: the database, study characteristics, and macronutrient intakes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 223S - 236S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Livesey, R. Taylor, T. Hulshof, and J. Howlett
Glycemic response and health a systematic review and meta-analysis: relations between dietary glycemic properties and health outcomes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 258S - 268S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Mosdol, D. R Witte, G. Frost, M. G Marmot, and E. J Brunner
Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load are associated with high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline but not with increased risk of diabetes in the Whitehall II study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 988 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. Kallio, M. Kolehmainen, D. E Laaksonen, J. Kekalainen, T. Salopuro, K. Sivenius, L. Pulkkinen, H. M Mykkanen, L. Niskanen, M. Uusitupa, et al.
Dietary carbohydrate modification induces alterations in gene expression in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue in persons with the metabolic syndrome: the FUNGENUT Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1417 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. O. Weickert, M. Mohlig, C. Schofl, A. M. Arafat, B. Otto, H. Viehoff, C. Koebnick, A. Kohl, J. Spranger, and A. F.H. Pfeiffer
Cereal Fiber Improves Whole-Body Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Women
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2006; 29(4): 775 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society for Nutrition