|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (ZC, TB, and SBG); the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (JAC); the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (RDJ); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (AZL); the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA (ML); the Stanford University, Stanford, CA (MLS); and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (KLM)
Background: It has been suggested that hormone therapy may help counter undesirable changes in body composition in older women.
Objective: This study was designed to test whether estrogen plus progestin (E+P) therapy favorably affects age-related changes in body composition in postmenopausal women.
Design: The substudy was composed of 835 women from the estrogen plus progestin trial of the Women's Health Initiative who were randomly assigned to receive either E+P therapy (n = 437) or placebo (n = 398). The women had a mean age of 63.1 y and, on average, were 13.8 y past menopause. More than 17% of the participants were from an ethnic minority. No significant differences in baseline body composition (measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) by intervention assignment were observed.
Results: After 3 y of intervention, the women who received active E+P therapy lost less lean soft tissue mass (0.04 kg) than did the women who received placebo (0.44 kg; P = 0.001). Additionally, the women in the E+P group had less upper-body fat distribution than did the women in the placebo group (change in ratio of trunk to leg fat mass: 0.025 for the E+P group and 0.004 for the placebo group; P = 0.003). A sensitivity analysis, which was conducted on the women who took
80% of the study medication during the intervention period, corroborated the findings from the intent-to-treat analysis.
Conclusions: A 3-y E+P intervention significantly reduced both the loss of lean soft tissue mass and the ratio of trunk to leg fat mass in postmenopausal women. However, the effect sizes were small, and whether these changes in body composition lead to significant health benefits remains to be confirmed.
Key Words: Estrogen plus progestin body composition Women's Health Initiative dual-energy X-ray absoptiometry postmenopausal women
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Wierman and W. M. Kohrt Review Article: Vascular and Metabolic Effects of Sex Steroids: New Insights Into Clinical Trials Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2007; 14(4): 300 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Carrero, A. R. Qureshi, J. Axelsson, C. M. Avesani, M. E Suliman, S. Kato, P. Barany, S. Snaedal-Jonsdottir, A. Alvestrand, O. Heimburger, et al. Comparison of nutritional and inflammatory markers in dialysis patients with reduced appetite Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 695 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Toth, C. K. Sites, and D. E. Matthews Role of ovarian hormones in the regulation of protein metabolism in women: effects of menopausal status and hormone replacement therapy Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2006; 291(3): E639 - E646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |