|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ (PWF, RLH, ITH, WCK, PAT, and ADS); the Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA (ER); the Section on Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics & Clinical Nutrition Research Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (DBA)
Background:Understanding the factors that contribute to physical inactivity in children is important because sedentary behavior strongly relates to metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes.
Objective:We aimed to quantify the genetic and environmental influences on physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) in 100 sex-concordant dizygotic (n = 38) and monozygotic (n = 62) twin pairs aged 4-10 y.
Design:Resting metabolic rate (RMR) was assessed by using respiratory gas exchange, total energy expenditure (TEE) by using doubly labeled water, and body composition by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Structural equation modeling was used to partition the phenotypic variance into additive genetic (a2) and common (c2) and unshared (e2) environmental components.
Results:Because PAEE [TEE (RMR + 0.1 x TEE)] depends on body weight, which is highly heritable, we tested several models: 1) after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, study date, season, and weight, a2 explained none of the phenotypic variance in PAEE (95% CI: 0%, 38%), whereas c2 and e2 accounted for 69% (33%, 77%; P = 0.001) and 31% (23%, 39%; P < 0.001) of the variance, respectively; 2) after adjustment for the cofactors in model 1, a2 explained 19% of the phenotypic variance in TEE (0%, 60%; P = 0.13), whereas c2 and e2 accounted for 59% (16%, 79%; P = 0.007) and 23% (17%, 31%; P < 0.0001) of the variance, respectively; 3) in models adjusted as above (excluding weight), a2 explained no variance in physical activity level (TEE/RMR) (0%, 32%; P = 0.50), whereas c2 and e2 explained 65% (34%, 60%; P = 0.001) and 35% (28%, 45%; P < 0.0001) of the variance, respectively.
Conclusions:Our data suggest that the familial resemblance in physical activity in these children is explained predominantly by shared environmental factors and not by genetic variability.
Key Words: Physical activity energy expenditure physical activity level genetics children twins doubly labeled water
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Teran-Garcia, T. Rankinen, and C. Bouchard Genes, exercise, growth, and the sedentary, obese child J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2008; 105(3): 988 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Franks Muscling in on the genetics of quantitative disease traits J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1111 - 1112. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J O'Loughlin, E Dugas, K Maximova, and N Kishchuk Reporting of ethnicity in research on chronic disease: update Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2006; 82(973): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. F Butte, G. Cai, S. A Cole, and A. G Comuzzie Viva la Familia Study: genetic and environmental contributions to childhood obesity and its comorbidities in the Hispanic population. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2006; 84(3): 646 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |