AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farin, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reaven, G. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farin, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reaven, G. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Farin, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reaven, G. M
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 1, 47-51, January 2006
© 2006 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Body mass index and waist circumference both contribute to differences in insulin-mediated glucose disposal in nondiabetic adults1,2,3

Helke MF Farin, Fahim Abbasi and Gerald M Reaven

1 From the Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Background: Overweight and obese individuals are more likely to be insulin resistant and at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Questions remain as to whether waist circumference (WC) or body mass index (BMI) most effectively identifies insulin-resistant individuals.

Objective: This study quantified insulin-mediated glucose uptake (IMGU) in 330 apparently healthy volunteers and compared the relation between this value and measurements of WC and BMI.

Design: IMGU was quantified via determination of the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration during the insulin-suppression test. Differences in SSPG concentrations due to variations in WC within a given BMI category, as well as those due to differences in BMI within a given WC classification, were then compared.

Results: BMI and WC correlated with each other (r = 0.78, P < 0.001) and equally with SSPG concentrations (r = 0.58 and 0.57, respectively; P < 0.001). When stratified by BMI, abdominally obese subjects within the overweight BMI category had higher SSPG concentrations than did those with a normal WC (P < 0.05). When classified by WC, subjects in the overweight BMI category had greater SSPG concentrations than did subjects in the normal BMI category within the normal WC category (P < 0.01), as did subjects in the obese BMI category in comparison with subjects in the overweight BMI category within the obese WC category (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: The more overweight or obese a person, the greater the degree of insulin resistance; differences in adiposity accounted for approximately one-third of the variation in IMGU, irrespective of the index used. Furthermore, there was no difference in the relation between the degree of insulin resistance and either index of adiposity.

Key Words: Obesity indexes • insulin resistance • abdominal obesity • overall obesity • body mass index • waist circumference




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
U. Riserus, J. Arnlov, and L. Berglund
Long-Term Predictors of Insulin Resistance: Role of lifestyle and metabolic factors in middle-aged men
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2007; 30(11): 2928 - 2933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
K. C. Sung, M. C. Ryan, B. S. Kim, Y. K. Cho, B. I. Kim, and G. M. Reaven
Relationships Between Estimates of Adiposity, Insulin Resistance, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Large Group of Nondiabetic Korean Adults
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2007; 30(8): 2113 - 2118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
G. M. Reaven
The Individual Components of the Metabolic Syndrome: Is There a Raison d'Etre?
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 26(3): 191 - 195.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition