AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, J. W
Right arrow Articles by Langkamp-Henken, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, J. W
Right arrow Articles by Langkamp-Henken, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, J. W
Right arrow Articles by Langkamp-Henken, B.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 2, 260-274, February 2006
© 2006 American Society for Clinical Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Effects of variation in protein and carbohydrate intake on body mass and composition during energy restriction: a meta-regression 1 ,2 ,3

James W Krieger1, Harry S Sitren1, Michael J Daniels1 and Bobbi Langkamp-Henken1

1 From the Departments of Food Science and Human Nutrition (JWK, HSS, and BL-H) and of Statistics (MJD), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Background: It is unclear whether low-carbohydrate, high-protein, weight-loss diets benefit body mass and composition beyond energy restriction alone.

Objective: The objective was to use meta-regression to determine the effects of variations in protein and carbohydrate intakes on body mass and composition during energy restriction.

Design: English-language studies with a dietary intervention of ≥4200 kJ/d (1000 kcal/d), with a duration of ≥4 wk, and conducted in subjects aged ≥19 y were considered eligible for inclusion. A self-reported intake in conjunction with a biological marker of macronutrient intake was required as a minimum level of dietary control. A total of 87 studies comprising 165 intervention groups met the inclusion criteria.

Results: After control for energy intake, diets consisting of ≤35–41.4% energy from carbohydrate were associated with a 1.74 kg greater loss of body mass, a 0.69 kg greater loss of fat-free mass, a 1.29% greater loss in percentage body fat, and a 2.05 kg greater loss of fat mass than were diets with a higher percentage of energy from carbohydrate. In studies that were conducted for >12 wk, these differences increased to 6.56 kg, 1.74 kg, 3.55%, and 5.57 kg, respectively. Protein intakes of >1.05 g/kg were associated with 0.60 kg additional fat-free mass retention compared with diets with protein intakes ≤1.05 g/kg. In studies conducted for >12 wk, this difference increased to 1.21 kg. No significant effects of protein intake on loss of either body mass or fat mass were observed.

Conclusion: Low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets favorably affect body mass and composition independent of energy intake, which in part supports the proposed metabolic advantage of these diets.

Key Words: Meta-analysis • body composition • high-protein diet • low-carbohydrate diet • weight loss




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. K Layman, P. Clifton, M. C Gannon, R. M Krauss, and F. Q Nuttall
Protein in optimal health: heart disease and type 2 diabetes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1571S - 1575S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. M Clifton, J. B Keogh, and M. Noakes
Long-term effects of a high-protein weight-loss diet
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. Muzio, L. Mondazzi, W. S Harris, D. Sommariva, and A. Branchi
Effects of moderate variations in the macronutrient content of the diet on cardiovascular disease risk factors in obese patients with the metabolic syndrome
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 946 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. C Westman, R. D Feinman, J. C Mavropoulos, M. C Vernon, J. S Volek, J. A Wortman, W. S Yancy, and S. D Phinney
Low-carbohydrate nutrition and metabolism
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 276 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. C Maki, T. M Rains, V. N Kaden, K. R Raneri, and M. H Davidson
Effects of a reduced-glycemic-load diet on body weight, body composition, and cardiovascular disease risk markers in overweight and obese adults
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 724 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. Byers and R. L. Sedjo
Public Health Response to the Obesity Epidemic: Too Soon or Too Late?
J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 488 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. S Johnston, A. M White, S. L Tjonn, P. D Swan, H. Hutchins, and B. Sears
Reply to NJ Krilanovich
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 239 - 240.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. H Manninen
Metabolic advantage of low-carbohydrate diets: a calorie is still not a calorie
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2006; 83(6): 1442 - 1443.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition