|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From the Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Parma, Parma, Italy (FB, DDR, NP, and FS); the Department of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (LB and IV); the Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy (CC); and the Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada (DJAJ)
Background: Low postprandial blood glucose is associated with low risk of metabolic diseases. A meal's ability to diminish the glucose response to carbohydrates eaten during the following meal is known as the "second-meal effect" (SME). The reduced glycemia elicited by low-glycemic-index (LGI) foods consumed during the first meal has been suggested as the main mechanism for SME. However, LGI foods often increase colonic fermentation because of the presence of fiber and resistant starch.
Objective: The objective was to study the SME of greater fermentation of high-glycemic-index (HGI) and LGI carbohydrates eaten during a previous meal.
Design: Ten healthy volunteers ate 3 breakfast test meals consisting of sponge cakes made with rapidly digestible, nonfermentable amylopectin starch plus cellulose (HGI meal), amylopectin starch plus the fermentable disaccharide lactulose (HGI-Lac meal), or slowly digestible, partly fermentable amylose starch plus cellulose (LGI meal). Five hours later, subjects were fed the same standard lunch containing 93 g available carbohydrates. Blood was collected for measurement of glucose, insulin, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs). Breath hydrogen was measured as a marker of colonic fermentation. Postlunch gastric emptying was measured by using ultrasonography.
Results: Both the HGI-Lac and LGI meals improved glucose tolerance at lunch. In the case of the HGI-Lac meal, this effect was concomitant with low NEFA concentrations and delayed gastric emptying.
Conclusion: Fermentable carbohydrates, independent of their effect on a food's glycemic index, have the potential to regulate postprandial responses to a second meal by reducing NEFA competition for glucose disposal and, to a minor extent, by affecting intestinal motility.
Key Words: Second-meal effect glycemic index colonic fermentation dietary fiber lactulose
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Hamedani, T. Akhavan, R. A. Samra, and G H. Anderson Reduced energy intake at breakfast is not compensated for at lunch if a high-insoluble-fiber cereal replaces a low-fiber cereal Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 1343 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Stevenson, N. M. Astbury, E. J. Simpson, M. A. Taylor, and I. A. Macdonald Fat Oxidation during Exercise and Satiety during Recovery Are Increased following a Low-Glycemic Index Breakfast in Sedentary Women J. Nutr., May 1, 2009; 139(5): 890 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C Nilsson, E. M Ostman, Y. Granfeldt, and I. M. Bjorck Effect of cereal test breakfasts differing in glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates on daylong glucose tolerance in healthy subjects Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 645 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Samra and G H. Anderson Insoluble cereal fiber reduces appetite and short-term food intake and glycemic response to food consumed 75 min later by healthy men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 972 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mosdol, D. R Witte, G. Frost, M. G Marmot, and E. J Brunner Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load are associated with high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol at baseline but not with increased risk of diabetes in the Whitehall II study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 988 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M Zivkovic, J B. German, and A. J Sanyal Comparative review of diets for the metabolic syndrome: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 285 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |