AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mingrone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Castagneto, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mingrone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Castagneto, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mingrone, G.
Right arrow Articles by Castagneto, M.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 5, 1017-1024, May 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Ultradian ghrelin pulsatility is disrupted in morbidly obese subjects after weight loss induced by malabsorptive bariatric surgery1,2,3

Geltrude Mingrone, Luigi Granato, Elena Valera-Mora, Amerigo Iaconelli, Menotti F Calvani, Roberto Bracaglia, Melania Manco, Giuseppe Nanni and Marco Castagneto

1 From the Departments of Internal Medicine (GM, EV-M, AI, MFC, and MM) and Surgery (RB, GN, and MC), CNR Centro di Fisiopatologia dello Shock, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Rome, Italy, and the Department of Computer and Systems Science, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy (LG)

Background: Suppression of ghrelin production after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass that suggested its contribution to appetite reduction has been reported.

Objective: Because biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) does not affect appetite, we compared ghrelin production and 24-h pulsatility between healthy control subjects and obese subjects before and after BPD.

Design: A computerized algorithm identified peak heights, clearance rate, and peak frequency of ghrelin over 24 h. Twenty-four–hour energy expenditure was measured in the calorimetric chamber, and energy intakes were computed. Insulin sensitivity was measured with a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp.

Results: Mean (±SD) 24-h plasma ghrelin concentrations were significantly (P < 0.0001) higher in control than in obese subjects (338.17 ± 22.09 and 164.47 ± 29.19 µg/L, respectively), but they increased to 204.64 ± 28.51 µg/L in the obese subjects after BPD (P < 0.01). The pulsatility index was 0.098 ± 0.016 and 0.041 ± 0.014 µg · L–1 · min–1 in control and obese subjects, respectively (P < 0.01), and decreased to 0.025 ± 0.007 µg · l–1 · min–1 after BPD (P < 0.05). Energy intakes before and after BFP did not differ significantly. Although metabolizable energy after BPD was 40% of the energy intake, that (per kg fat-free mass) after BPD did not different significantly from that before BPD.

Conclusions: Weight loss induced by malabsorptive bariatric surgery is associated with greater ghrelin concentrations, which, however, remain consistently lower than those in control subjects, whereas ghrelin pulsatility is subverted. Higher ghrelin concentrations may contribute to the high calorie intakes observed in post-BPD subjects. The lack of normal pulsatility may explain the new impulse of these subjects to eat very frequently.

Key Words: Biliopancreatic diversion • morbid obesity • ghrelin • pulsatility • appetite • insulin sensitivity • energy intake







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition