AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C. S
Right arrow Articles by Sears, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C. S
Right arrow Articles by Sears, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C. S
Right arrow Articles by Sears, B.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 83, No. 5, 1055-1061, May 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets have no metabolic advantage over nonketogenic low-carbohydrate diets1,2,3

Carol S Johnston, Sherrie L Tjonn, Pamela D Swan, Andrea White, Heather Hutchins and Barry Sears

1 From the Department of Nutrition, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ (CSJ, PDS, and AW); Conscious Cuisine, Scottsdale, AZ (SLT); and Inflammation Research Foundation, Marblehead, MA (HH and BS)

Background:Low-carbohydrate diets may promote greater weight loss than does the conventional low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet.

Objective:We compared weight loss and biomarker change in adults adhering to a ketogenic low-carbohydrate (KLC) diet or a nonketogenic low-carbohydrate (NLC) diet.

Design:Twenty adults [body mass index (in kg/m2): 34.4 ± 1.0] were randomly assigned to the KLC (60% of energy as fat, beginning with {approx}5% of energy as carbohydrate) or NLC (30% of energy as fat; {approx}40% of energy as carbohydrate) diet. During the 6-wk trial, participants were sedentary, and 24-h intakes were strictly controlled.

Results:Mean (±SE) weight losses (6.3 ± 0.6 and 7.2 ± 0.8 kg in KLC and NLC dieters, respectively; P = 0.324) and fat losses (3.4 and 5.5 kg in KLC and NLC dieters, respectively; P = 0.111) did not differ significantly by group after 6 wk. Blood ß-hydroxybutyrate in the KLC dieters was 3.6 times that in the NLC dieters at week 2 (P = 0.018), and LDL cholesterol was directly correlated with blood ß-hydroxybutyrate (r = 0.297, P = 0.025). Overall, insulin sensitivity and resting energy expenditure increased and serum {gamma}-glutamyltransferase concentrations decreased in both diet groups during the 6-wk trial (P < 0.05). However, inflammatory risk (arachidonic acid:eicosapentaenoic acid ratios in plasma phospholipids) and perceptions of vigor were more adversely affected by the KLC than by the NLC diet.

Conclusions:KLC and NLC diets were equally effective in reducing body weight and insulin resistance, but the KLC diet was associated with several adverse metabolic and emotional effects. The use of ketogenic diets for weight loss is not warranted.

Key Words: Ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets • nonketogenic low-carbohydrate diets • weight loss • adults • insulin resistance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. M Zivkovic, J B. German, and A. J Sanyal
Comparative review of diets for the metabolic syndrome: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 285 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. H. Duncan, A. Belenguer, G. Holtrop, A. M. Johnstone, H. J. Flint, and G. E. Lobley
Reduced Dietary Intake of Carbohydrates by Obese Subjects Results in Decreased Concentrations of Butyrate and Butyrate-Producing Bacteria in Feces
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2007; 73(4): 1073 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. J Krilanovich
Benefits of ketogenic diets
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 238 - 239.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. S Johnston, A. M White, S. L Tjonn, P. D Swan, H. Hutchins, and B. Sears
Reply to NJ Krilanovich
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 239 - 240.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition