AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinig, M J.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heinig, M J.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heinig, M J.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 84, No. 3, 594-601, September 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Zinc supplementation does not affect growth, morbidity, or motor development of US term breastfed infants at 4–10 mo of age1,2,3

M Jane Heinig, Kenneth H Brown, Bo Lönnerdal and Kathryn G Dewey

1 From the Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.

Background: It has been documented that growth patterns differ between breastfed and formula-fed infants. Some investigators have suggested that these differences may be related to differences in zinc nutriture.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of zinc supplementation on growth, morbidity, and motor development in healthy, term, breastfed infants.

Design: We conducted a randomized double-blind intervention comparing zinc supplementation (5 mg/d as zinc sulfate) with placebo in breastfed infants aged 4–10 mo. Growth and indexes of body composition and gross motor development were measured monthly from 3 to 10 mo. Morbidity data were collected weekly.

Results: Eighty-five infants were enrolled, and 70 completed the study. The baseline characteristics, attained weight or length at 10 mo, growth velocity, gross motor development, and morbidity did not differ significantly between groups, even after control for potentially confounding variables.

Conclusions: The dietary zinc intake of these breastfed infants appeared to be adequate, given that zinc supplementation did not affect growth, development, or risk of infection (although sample size for detection of differences in development or infection was limited). Previously described differences in growth between breastfed and formula-fed infants in such populations do not appear to be due to differences in zinc nutriture.

Key Words: Zinc • randomized supplementation trial • infant growth • motor development • breastfeeding




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, October 14, 2006; 333(7572): 814 - 814.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition