AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hätönen, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Valsta, L. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hätönen, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Valsta, L. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hätönen, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Valsta, L. M
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 84, No. 5, 1055-1061, November 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Methodologic considerations in the measurement of glycemic index: glycemic response to rye bread, oatmeal porridge, and mashed potato1,2,3

Katja A Hätönen, Minna E Similä, Jarmo R Virtamo, Johan G Eriksson, Marja-Leena Hannila, Harri K Sinkko, Jouko E Sundvall, Hannu M Mykkänen and Liisa M Valsta

1 From the Departments of Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention (KAH, MES, JRV, JGE, M-LH, HKS, and LMV) and of Health and Functional Capacity (JES), the National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland; the Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (JGE); the Department of Environmental Health, the National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland (M-LH); and the Department of Clinical Nutrition, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland (HMM)

Background: Methodologic choices affect measures of the glycemic index (GI). The effects on GI values of blood sampling site, reference food type, and the number of repeat tests have been insufficiently determined.

Objective: The objective was to study the effect of methodologic choices on GI values. Comparisons were made between venous and capillary blood sampling and between glucose and white bread as the reference food. The number of tests needed for the reference food was assessed. Rye bread, oatmeal porridge, and instant mashed potato were used as the test foods.

Design: Twelve healthy volunteers were served each test food once and both reference foods 3 times at 1-wk intervals in a random order after they had fasted overnight. Capillary and venous blood samples were drawn at intervals for 3 h after each study meal.

Results: GIs and their CVs based on capillary samples were lower than those based on venous samples. Two tests of glucose solution as the reference provided stable capillary GIs for the test foods. The capillary GIs did not differ significantly when white bread was used as the reference 1, 2, or 3 times, but the variation was lower when tests were performed 2 and 3 times. Capillary GIs with white bread as the reference were 1.3 times as high as those with glucose as the reference. The capillary GIs of rye bread, oatmeal porridge, and mashed potato were 77, 74, and 80, respectively, with glucose as the reference.

Conclusions: Capillary blood sampling should be used in the measurement of GI, and reference tests with glucose or white bread should be performed at least twice.

Key Words: Glycemic index • capillary blood • venous blood • methods • reference food • rye bread • oatmeal porridge • mashed potato




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. M. Wolever, J. C Brand-Miller, J. Abernethy, A. Astrup, F. Atkinson, M. Axelsen, I. Bjorck, F. Brighenti, R. Brown, A. Brynes, et al.
Measuring the glycemic index of foods: interlaboratory study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 247S - 257S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition