HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morgan, M. Y Articles by Fuller, N. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morgan, M. Y Articles by Fuller, N. J Agricola Articles by Morgan, M. Y Articles by Fuller, N. J

Two-component models are of limited value for the assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis^1,2,3

¹ From The UCL Institute of Hepatology, Hampstead Campus, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom (MYM and AMM), and The MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom (GJ, ME, and NJF)

Background: Most techniques for measuring body composition are based on 2-component models (2-CMs) and depend on assumptions relating to the constancy of the density (D_FFM) and hydration fraction (HF_FFM) of fat-free mass (FFM).

Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether these assumptions are systematically violated in patients with cirrhosis and to assess the validity of the estimates of body composition obtained in these patients by using 2-CM techniques.

Design: Body composition was assessed by using a 4-component model (4-CM), which was based on data obtained from densitometry, deuterium dilution, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in 20 patients with cirrhosis who had no evidence of fluid retention and in 20 pair-matched healthy control subjects. The results were compared with those obtained by using "reference" and "bedside" 2-CM techniques.

Results: The mean (±SD) D_FFM was significantly lower in the patients with cirrhosis (1.091 ± 0.008 compared with 1.100 ± 0.006 kg/L; P < 0.001); no significant difference in HF_FFM was observed between the patients and control subjects (74.5 ± 2.6 compared with 73.5 ± 2.1), although there was greater variability in the patients. Significant differences were observed in the body-composition variables obtained by using the "reference" 2-CM techniques compared with the 4-CM—the 95% limits of agreement in the patients with cirrhosis exceeded 5% body fat and 3 kg FFM; the corresponding values for the "bedside" 2-CM techniques were 11% body fat and 7.5 kg FFM.

Conclusions: Assumptions relating to the constancy of the D_FFM and HF_FFM are violated in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, standard 2-CM techniques provide inaccurate body composition estimates in this patient population.

Key Words: Anthropometric measures • bioelectrical impedance analysis • body composition • cirrhosis • 4-component model • densitometry • density of fat-free mass • deuterium dilution • dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry • fat-free mass • healthy control subjects • hydration of fat-free mass • near-infrared interactance • percentage fat mass • urinary creatinine

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J Muller Malnutrition and hypermetabolism in patients with liver cirrhosis Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1167 - 1168. [Full Text] [PDF]