AJCN EB Program 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koo, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hockman, E. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koo, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hockman, E. M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koo, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hockman, E. M
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 84, No. 6, 1357-1364, December 2006
© 2006 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Posthospital discharge feeding for preterm infants: effects of standard compared with enriched milk formula on growth, bone mass, and body composition1,2,3

Winston WK Koo and Elaine M Hockman

1 From The Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University and Hutzel Hospital (WWKK), and Computing and Information Technology, Wayne State University (EMH), Detroit, MI

Background: Despite the theoretical benefits of nutrient-enriched formula given to preterm infants after hospital discharge, its role in reversing growth deficits after hospital discharge remains poorly defined.

Objective: The aim was to determine the effect of different formulas on the growth, bone mass, and body composition of preterm infants after hospital discharge.

Design: This was a randomized, double blind comparison of a nutrient-enriched formula (EF) and a formula for term infants (TF) given for 1 y after hospital discharge. Compared with the TF, the EF had a higher energy density and higher contents of protein, calcium, and phosphorus (by 10%, 21%, 44%, and 11%, respectively) and higher contents of almost all other nutrients (by ≥10%).

Results: Birth weights of the infants were 630–1620 g (median: 1250 g) and gestational ages were 24–34 wk (median: 29 wk). TF resulted in significantly greater weight, length, head circumference measurements, and their respective z scores on the basis of age- and sex-specific norms. At the end of the study, the mean z scores for the corrected age of infants in the TF group were –0.37 for weight, 0.001 for length, and 0.50 for head circumference. The TF group also had significantly greater dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measured bone and lean and fat mass than did the EF group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons).

Conclusions: The use of EF for preterm infants after hospital discharge shows no advantage over TF in growth, bone mineralization, and body composition. More studies are needed to determine the optimal postdischarge nutrition support for preterm infants.

Key Words: Nutrition support • dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry • infants • bone • lean • fat




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. L. O'Connor, S. Khan, K. Weishuhn, J. Vaughan, A. Jefferies, D. M. Campbell, E. Asztalos, M. Feldman, J. Rovet, C. Westall, et al.
Growth and Nutrient Intakes of Human Milk-Fed Preterm Infants Provided With Extra Energy and Nutrients After Hospital Discharge
Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): 766 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. C. Heird
Progress in Promoting Breast-Feeding, Combating Malnutrition, and Composition and Use of Infant Formula, 1981-2006
J. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 137(2): 499S - 502S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The American Society for Nutrition