AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gill, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, I. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gill, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, I. R
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gill, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, I. R
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 85, No. 2, 504-510, February 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Watercress supplementation in diet reduces lymphocyte DNA damage and alters blood antioxidant status in healthy adults1,2,3

Chris IR Gill, Sumanto Haldar, Lindsay A Boyd, Richard Bennett, Joy Whiteford, Michelle Butler, Jenny R Pearson, Ian Bradbury and Ian R Rowland

1 From the Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health, Centre for Molecular Biosciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, N Ireland, United Kingdom (CIRG, SH, LAB, JW, MB, JRP, IB, and IRR), and the Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich, United Kingdom (RB)

Background: Cruciferous vegetable (CV) consumption is associated with a reduced risk of several cancers in epidemiologic studies.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of watercress (a CV) supplementation on biomarkers related to cancer risk in healthy adults.

Design: A single-blind, randomized, crossover study was conducted in 30 men and 30 women (30 smokers and 30 nonsmokers) with a mean age of 33 y (range: 19–55 y). The subjects were fed 85 g raw watercress daily for 8 wk in addition to their habitual diet. The effect of supplementation was measured on a range of endpoints, including DNA damage in lymphocytes (with the comet assay), activity of detoxifying enzymes (glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase) in erythrocytes, plasma antioxidants (retinol, ascorbic acid, {alpha}-tocopherol, lutein, and ß-carotene), plasma total antioxidant status with the use of the ferric reducing ability of plasma assay, and plasma lipid profile.

Results: Watercress supplementation (active compared with control phase) was associated with reductions in basal DNA damage (by 17%; P = 0.03), in basal plus oxidative purine DNA damage (by 23.9%; P = 0.002), and in basal DNA damage in response to ex vivo hydrogen peroxide challenge (by 9.4%; P = 0.07). Beneficial changes seen after watercress intervention were greater and more significant in smokers than in nonsmokers. Plasma lutein and ß-carotene increased significantly by 100% and 33% (P < 0.001), respectively, after watercress supplementation.

Conclusion: The results support the theory that consumption of watercress can be linked to a reduced risk of cancer via decreased damage to DNA and possible modulation of antioxidant status by increasing carotenoid concentrations.

Key Words: Watercress • cruciferous vegetables • DNA damage • antioxidants • humans • cancer biomarkers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
J. Rowbotham and P. Clayton
An unsuitable and degraded diet? Part three: Victorian consumption patterns and their health benefits
J R Soc Med, September 1, 2008; 101(9): 454 - 462.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
G. R. Wasson, V. J. McKelvey-Martin, and C. S. Downes
The use of the comet assay in the study of human nutrition and cancer
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 153 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition