HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goldenberg, R. L Articles by Culhane, J. F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goldenberg, R. L Articles by Culhane, J. F Agricola Articles by Goldenberg, R. L Articles by Culhane, J. F

Low birth weight in the United States^1,2,3

¹ From Drexel University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia, PA

ABSTRACT

Pregnancy outcomes in the United States and other developed countries are considerably better than those in many developing countries. However, adverse pregnancy outcomes are generally more common in the United States than in other developed countries. Low-birth-weight infants, born after a preterm birth or secondary to intrauterine growth restriction, account for much of the increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. Wide disparities exist in both preterm birth and growth restriction among different population groups. Poor and black women, for example, have twice the preterm birth rate and higher rates of growth restriction than do most other women. Low birth weight in general is thought to place the infant at greater risk of later adult chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. Of interest, maternal thinness is a strong predictor of both preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. However, in the United States, several nutritional interventions, including high-protein diets, caloric supplementation, calcium and iron supplementation, and various other vitamin and mineral supplementations, have not generally reduced preterm birth or growth restriction. Bacterial intrauterine infections play an important role in the etiology of the earliest preterm births, but, at least to date, antibiotic treatment either before labor for risk factors such as bacterial vaginosis or during preterm labor have not consistently reduced the preterm birth rate. Most interventions have failed to reduce preterm birth or growth restriction. The substantial improvement in newborn survival in the United States over the past several decades is mostly due to better access to improved neonatal care for low-birth-weight infants.

Key Words: Low birth weight • preterm birth • fetal growth restriction • cerebral palsy • neonatal mortality • stillbirth

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Ruano, E. J. de A Pimenta, M. M. da Silva, J. G. Maksoud, and M. Zugaib Percutaneous Intrauterine Laser Ablation of the Abnormal Vessel in Pulmonary Sequestration With Hydrops at 29 Weeks' Gestation J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2007; 26(9): 1235 - 1241. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J Raiten, S. C Kalhan, and W. W Hay Jr Maternal nutrition and optimal infant feeding practices: executive summary Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 577S - 583S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]