AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ello-Martin, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Rolls, B. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ello-Martin, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Rolls, B. J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ello-Martin, J. A
Right arrow Articles by Rolls, B. J
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 85, No. 6, 1465-1477, June 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets1,2,3

Julia A Ello-Martin, Liane S Roe, Jenny H Ledikwe, Amanda M Beach and Barbara J Rolls

1 From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

Background: Consuming foods low in energy density (kcal/g) decreases energy intake over several days, but the effectiveness of this strategy for weight loss has not been tested.

Objective: The effects on weight loss of 2 strategies for reducing the energy density of the diet were compared over 1 y.

Design: Obese women (n = 97) were randomly assigned to groups counseled either to reduce their fat intake (RF group) or to reduce their fat intake and increase their intake of water-rich foods, particularly fruit and vegetables (RF+FV group). No goals for energy or fat intake were assigned; the subjects were instructed to eat ad libitum amounts of food while following the principles of their diet.

Results: After 1 y, study completers (n = 71) in both groups had significant decreases in body weight (P < 0.0001). Subjects in the RF+FV group, however, had a significantly different pattern of weight loss (P = 0.002) than did subjects in the RF group. After 1 y, the RF+FV group lost 7.9 ± 0.9 kg and the RF group lost 6.4 ± 0.9 kg. Analysis of all randomly assigned subjects also showed a different pattern of weight loss between groups (P = 0.021). Diet records indicated that both groups had similar reductions in fat intake. The RF+FV group, however, had a lower dietary energy density than did the RF group (P = 0.019) as the result of consuming a greater weight of food (P = 0.025), especially fruit and vegetables (P = 0.037). The RF+FV group also reported less hunger (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: Reducing dietary energy density, particularly by combining increased fruit and vegetable intakes with decreased fat intake, is an effective strategy for managing body weight while controlling hunger.

Key Words: Energy density • fruit and vegetables • water-rich foods • fat intake • obesity • weight management




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. A McCaffrey, K. L Rennie, M. A Kerr, J. M Wallace, M. P Hannon-Fletcher, W A. Coward, S. A Jebb, and M B. E Livingstone
Energy density of the diet and change in body fatness from childhood to adolescence; is there a relation?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition