AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hitz, M. F
Right arrow Articles by Eskildsen, P. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hitz, M. F
Right arrow Articles by Eskildsen, P. C
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hitz, M. F
Right arrow Articles by Eskildsen, P. C
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 1, 251-259, July 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Bone mineral density and bone markers in patients with a recent low-energy fracture: effect of 1 y of treatment with calcium and vitamin D1,2,3

Mette F Hitz, Jens-Erik B Jensen and Peter C Eskildsen

1 From the Medical Department, Roskilde University Hospital Koge, Koge, Denmark (MFH and PCE), and the Calcium- and Bone-Metabolic Unit, Endocrine Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (J-EBJ)

Background: Low-energy fractures of the hip, forearm, shoulder, and spine are known consequences of osteoporosis.

Objective: We evaluated the effect of 1 y of treatment with calcium and vitamin D on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers in patients with a recent low-energy fracture.

Design: In a double-blinded design, patients with fracture of the hip (lower-extremity fracture, or LEF) or upper extremity (UEF) were randomly assigned to receive 3000 mg calcium carbonate + 1400 IU cholecalciferol or placebo (200 IU cholecalciferol). BMD of the hip (HBMD) and lumbar spine (LBMD) were evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and physical performance was assessed by the timed Up & Go test. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol, parathyroid hormone (PTH), telepeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin, and N-terminal propeptide of collagen type I were measured.

Results: A total of 122 patients were included (84% women; x ± SD age: 70 ± 11 y); 68% completed the study. In an intention-to-treat analysis, LBMD increased in the intervention group and decreased in the placebo group, and the difference between the groups was significant after 12 mo: 0.931 ± 0.211 compared with 0.848 ± 0.194 (P < 0.05). No significant change was shown for HBMD. The effect of treatment was more pronounced in patients aged <70 y. The intervention decreased bone turnover. PTH was significantly lower in the intervention group (P < 0.01) for the LEF patients. ICTP and change in LBMD were significantly related to physical performance.

Conclusions: A 1-y intervention with calcium and vitamin D reduced bone turnover, significantly increased BMD in patients younger than 70 y, and decreased bone loss in older patients. The effect of treatment was related to physical performance.

Key Words: Bone markers • bone mineral density • calcium • immobility • low-energy fracture • hip fracture • shoulder fracture • forearm fracture • vitamin D







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition