|
|
||||||||
ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION |
1 From Merck & Company, Rahway, NJ (SBH and JB); the New York Obesity Research Center (DG) and the Department of Psychiatry (LM), Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; and the Pediatric Unit, Verona University Medical School, Verona, Italy (AP)
Background: Although Quetelet first reported in 1835 that adult weight scales to the square of stature, limited or no information is available on how anatomical body compartments, including adipose tissue (AT), scale to height.
Objective: We examined the critical underlying assumptions of adipositybody mass index (BMI) relations and extended these analyses to major anatomical compartments: skeletal muscle (SM), bone, residual mass, weight (AT+SM+bone), AT-free mass, and organs (liver, brain).
Design: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 2 body-composition databases: one including magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) estimates of evaluated components in adults (total n = 411; organs = 76) and the other a larger DXA database (n = 1346) that included related estimates of fat, fat-free mass, and bone mineral mass.
Results: Weight, primary lean components (SM, residual mass, AT-free mass, and fat-free mass), and liver scaled to height with powers of
2 (all P < 0.001); bone and bone mineral mass scaled to height with powers >2 (2.312.48), and the fraction of weight as bone mineral mass was significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with height in women. AT scaled weakly to height with powers of
2, and adiposity was independent of height. Brain mass scaled to height with a power of 0.83 (P = 0.04) in men and nonsignificantly in women; the fraction of weight as brain was inversely related to height in women (P = 0.002).
Conclusions: These observations suggest that short and tall subjects with equivalent BMIs have similar but not identical body composition, provide new insights into earlier BMI-related observations and thus establish a foundation for height-normalized indexes, and create an analytic framework for future studies.
Key Words: Height brain mass liver mass skeletal muscle adipose tissue obesity
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. L Iannotti, N. Zavaleta, Z. Leon, A. H Shankar, and L. E Caulfield Maternal zinc supplementation and growth in Peruvian infants Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2008; 88(1): 154 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. E. Dewey, D. Rosenthal, D. J. Murphy Jr, V. F. Froelicher, and E. A. Ashley Does Size Matter?: Clinical Applications of Scaling Cardiac Size and Function for Body Size Circulation, April 29, 2008; 117(17): 2279 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Leonard, S. Towler, S. Welcome, L. K. Halderman, R. Otto, M. A. Eckert, and C. Chiarello Size Matters: Cerebral Volume Influences Sex Differences in Neuroanatomy Cereb Cortex, April 24, 2008; (2008) bhn052v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Heymsfield, D. Childers, J. Beetsch, D. B. Allison, and A. Pietrobelli Body size and human energy requirements: reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure in tall adults J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1543 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |