AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 1, 82-91, July 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Scaling of human body composition to stature: new insights into body mass index1,2,3

Steven B Heymsfield, Dympna Gallagher, Laurel Mayer, Joel Beetsch and Angelo Pietrobelli

1 From Merck & Company, Rahway, NJ (SBH and JB); the New York Obesity Research Center (DG) and the Department of Psychiatry (LM), Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; and the Pediatric Unit, Verona University Medical School, Verona, Italy (AP)

Background: Although Quetelet first reported in 1835 that adult weight scales to the square of stature, limited or no information is available on how anatomical body compartments, including adipose tissue (AT), scale to height.

Objective: We examined the critical underlying assumptions of adiposity–body mass index (BMI) relations and extended these analyses to major anatomical compartments: skeletal muscle (SM), bone, residual mass, weight (AT+SM+bone), AT-free mass, and organs (liver, brain).

Design: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 2 body-composition databases: one including magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) estimates of evaluated components in adults (total n = 411; organs = 76) and the other a larger DXA database (n = 1346) that included related estimates of fat, fat-free mass, and bone mineral mass.

Results: Weight, primary lean components (SM, residual mass, AT-free mass, and fat-free mass), and liver scaled to height with powers of {approx}2 (all P < 0.001); bone and bone mineral mass scaled to height with powers >2 (2.31–2.48), and the fraction of weight as bone mineral mass was significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with height in women. AT scaled weakly to height with powers of {approx}2, and adiposity was independent of height. Brain mass scaled to height with a power of 0.83 (P = 0.04) in men and nonsignificantly in women; the fraction of weight as brain was inversely related to height in women (P = 0.002).

Conclusions: These observations suggest that short and tall subjects with equivalent BMIs have similar but not identical body composition, provide new insights into earlier BMI-related observations and thus establish a foundation for height-normalized indexes, and create an analytic framework for future studies.

Key Words: Height • brain mass • liver mass • skeletal muscle • adipose tissue • obesity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. B. Heymsfield, T. Chirachariyavej, I. J. Rhyu, C. Roongpisuthipong, M. Heo, and A. Pietrobelli
Differences between brain mass and body weight scaling to height: potential mechanism of reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure of taller adults
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 40 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. M. Leonard, S. Towler, S. Welcome, L. K. Halderman, R. Otto, M. A. Eckert, and C. Chiarello
Size Matters: Cerebral Volume Influences Sex Differences in Neuroanatomy
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 2920 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. L Iannotti, N. Zavaleta, Z. Leon, A. H Shankar, and L. E Caulfield
Maternal zinc supplementation and growth in Peruvian infants
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2008; 88(1): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. E. Dewey, D. Rosenthal, D. J. Murphy Jr, V. F. Froelicher, and E. A. Ashley
Does Size Matter?: Clinical Applications of Scaling Cardiac Size and Function for Body Size
Circulation, April 29, 2008; 117(17): 2279 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. B. Heymsfield, D. Childers, J. Beetsch, D. B. Allison, and A. Pietrobelli
Body size and human energy requirements: reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure in tall adults
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1543 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition