AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dominguez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, M. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dominguez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, M. P
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dominguez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, M. P
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 1, 92-99, July 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Treatment of anorexia nervosa is associated with increases in bone mineral density, and recovery is a biphasic process involving both nutrition and return of menses1,2,3

Jennifer Dominguez, Linnea Goodman, Surupa Sen Gupta, Laurel Mayer, Sarah Fischer Etu, B Timothy Walsh, Jack Wang, Richard Pierson and Michelle P Warren

1 From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JD, LG, SSG, and MPW), Psychiatry (BTW), and Medicine (MPW and RP), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY (BTW, LM, and SFE); and St Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY (RP and JW)

Background: Recovery from osteoporosis in anorexia nervosa (AN) is uncertain.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in women with AN and the mechanisms of recovery from osteopenia.

Design: We studied BMD and markers of bone formation and resorption, osteocalcin and N-telopeptide (NTX), in patients with AN (n = 28) who were following a behavioral weight-gain protocol.

Results: Anorexic patients experienced significant percentage increases in BMD (4.38 ± 7.48% for spine; 3.77 ± 8.8% for hip; P < 0.05 for both) from admission until recovery of 90% ideal body weight, achieved over 2.2 mo. NTX concentrations were higher in patients with AN at admission than in healthy control subjects (n =11; 69.0 ± 31.09 and 48.3 ± 14.38 nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively; P < 0.05) and in reference control subjects (n = 30; 69.0 ± 31.09 and 37.0±6.00 nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively; P < 0.001). In weight-recovered subjects with AN, osteocalcin increased (from 8.0 ± 3.05 to 11.2 ± 6.54 ng/mL; P < 0.05), whereas NTX remained elevated (from 69.0 ± 31.09 to 66.7 ± 45.5 nmol/mmol creatinine; NS). A decrease in NTX (from 70.7 ± 40.84 to 45.9 ± 22.72 nmol/mmol creatinine; NS) occurred only in the subgroup of subjects who regained menses with weight recovery.

Conclusions: Nutritional rehabilitation induces a powerful anabolic effect on bone. However, a fall of NTX and a shift from the dominant resorptive state, which we postulate involves full recovery, may involve a hormonal mechanism and require a return of menses. Nutritional rehabilitation appears to be critical to bone recovery and may explain the ineffectiveness of estrogen treatment alone on BMD in the cachectic state.

Key Words: Anorexia nervosa • bone mineral density • osteopenia • amenorrhea • bone markers







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition