HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Burke, L. E Articles by Sereika, S. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Burke, L. E Articles by Sereika, S. M Agricola Articles by Burke, L. E Articles by Sereika, S. M

Effects of a vegetarian diet and treatment preference on biochemical and dietary variables in overweight and obese adults: a randomized clinical trial^1,2,3

¹ From the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA (LEB, MAS, MTW, EM, SMS), and the Departments of Epidemiology (LEB, AGH, and SMS) and Biostatistics (SMS and OUE), Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Background:A vegetarian diet may lead to numerous health benefits, including weight loss.

Objective:We examined the joint effects of personal preference of dietary treatment and a calorie-restricted, low-fat lactoovovegetarian diet (LOV-D) compared with a standard calorie-restricted, low-fat omnivorous diet (STD-D) on changes in weight, total cholesterol, ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol (LDL:HDL cholesterol), triacylglycerols, insulin resistance, and macronutrient intake during an 18-mo study.

Design:This was a randomized clinical trial of 176 overweight and obese adults who were recruited and randomly assigned first to 1 of 2 preference conditions (yes or no). If assigned to Preference-No, they were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 diet conditions (STD-D or LOV-D). If assigned to Preference-Yes, they were assigned to the diet they indicated as preferred at screening. The 12-mo intervention was followed by a 6-mo maintenance phase.

Results:Participants were mainly women (86.9%) and white (70.5%); 75% completed the 18-mo study. A significant interaction between preference and dietary treatment was not observed for any of the outcome variables. However, participants in the Preference-No groups significantly decreased their triacylglycerols (P = 0.04). The only effect observed for diet was a borderline significant decrease in LDL:HDL cholesterol for the LOV-D group (P = 0.06). Within the LOV-D groups, those who were 100% adherent to the LOV-D had significant and marginally significant reductions in monounsaturated fat (P = 0.02) and total fat (P = 0.05) intakes at 18 mo.

Conclusions:Our findings suggest that neither prescribing a vegetarian diet nor allowing persons to choose their preferred diet had a significant effect on outcome measures. However, all participants had a significant reduction in total energy and fat intakes and an increase in energy expenditure, which was reflected in reduced body weight. This clinical trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00330629.

Key Words: Vegetarian diet • treatment preference • randomized clinical trial • lipids • macronutrients

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Tonstad, T. Butler, R. Yan, and G. E. Fraser Type of Vegetarian Diet, Body Weight, and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, May 1, 2009; 32(5): 791 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]