AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston & Online Sept 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elia, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, J.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 3, 618-624, September 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Fetal programming of body dimensions and percentage body fat measured in prepubertal children with a 4-component model of body composition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, deuterium dilution, densitometry, and skinfold thicknesses1,2,3

Marinos Elia, Peter Betts, Diane M Jackson and Jean Mulligan

1 From the Institute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom (ME); Department of Child Health, Southampton University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom (PB and JM); and Public Health Nutrition Group, Obesity and Metabolic Division, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom (DMJ)

Background: Intrauterine programming of body composition [percentage body fat (%BF)] has been sparsely examined with multiple independent reference techniques in children. The effects on and consequences of body build (dimensions, mass, and length of body segments) are unclear.

Objective: The study examined whether percentage fat and relation of percentage fat to body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) in prepubertal children are programmed during intrauterine development and are dependent on body build. It also aimed to examine the extent to which height can be predicted by parental height and birth weight.

Design: Eighty-five white children (44 boys, 41 girls; aged 6.5–9.1 y) had body composition measured with a 4-component model (n = 58), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (n = 84), deuterium dilution (n = 81), densitometry (n = 62), and skinfold thicknesses (n = 85).

Results: An increase in birth weight of 1 SD was associated with a decrease of 1.95% fat as measured by the 4-component model (P = 0.012) and 0.82–2.75% by the other techniques. These associations were independent of age, sex, socioeconomic status, physical activity, BMI, and body build. Body build did not decrease the strength of the associations. Birth weight was a significantly better predictor of height than was self-reported midparental height, accounting for 19.4% of the variability at 5 y of age and 10.3% at 7.8 y of age (17.8% and 8.8% of which were independent of parental height at these ages, respectively).

Conclusions: Consistent trends across body-composition measurement techniques add strength to the suggestion that percentage fat in prepubertal children is programmed in utero (independently of body build and BMI). It also suggests birth weight is a better predictor of prepubertal height than is self-reported midparental height.

Key Words: Programming • body composition • birth weight • fat • protein • mineral • water • lean mass • 4-component model • height • parental height • shape • body build • leg • trunk • length




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Chomtho, J. C. Wells, J. E Williams, A. Lucas, and M. S Fewtrell
Associations between birth weight and later body composition: evidence from the 4-component model
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1040 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. B. Ebbeling and D. S. Ludwig
Tracking Pediatric Obesity: An Index of Uncertainty?
JAMA, May 28, 2008; 299(20): 2442 - 2443.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition