AJCN Tufts Nutrition Symposium, Boston Sept 24-26
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. W
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. W
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. I
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. W
Right arrow Articles by Mann, J. I
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 3, 735-742, September 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

APPLE Project: 2-y findings of a community-based obesity prevention program in primary school–age children1,2,3

Rachael W Taylor, Kirsten A McAuley, Wyn Barbezat, Amber Strong, Sheila M Williams and Jim I Mann

1 From the Departments of Human Nutrition (RWT, WB, AS, and JIM) and Preventive and Social Medicine (SMW) and the Edgar National Centre for Diabetes Research (KAM and JIM), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Background: Developing effective strategies for obesity prevention in children is urgently required.

Objective: We determined the effectiveness of a 2-y controlled community-based intervention to prevent excessive weight gain in 5–12-y-old children by enhancing opportunities for healthy eating and noncurricular physical activity.

Design: Children (n = 730) from 4 intervention and 3 control schools underwent measurements of height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, diet, and physical activity at baseline and at 1 and 2 y. Intervention components included nutrition education that targeted reductions in sweetened drinks and increased fruit and vegetable intake and activity coordinators who managed an activity program that focused on noncurricular lifestyle-based activities (eg, community walks).

Results: Body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2) z score was significantly lower in intervention children than in control children by a mean of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.18) after 1 y and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.32) at 2 y, but the prevalence of overweight did not differ. Waist circumference was significantly lower at 2 y (–1 cm), and systolic blood pressure was reduced at 1 y (–2.9 mm Hg). An interaction existed between intervention group and overweight status (P = 0.029), such that mean BMI z score was reduced in normal-weight (–0.29; 95% CI: –0.38, –0.21) but not overweight (–0.02; 95% CI: –0.16, 0.12) intervention children relative to controls. Intervention children consumed fewer carbonated beverages (67% of control intake; P = 0.04) and fruit juice or drinks (70%; P = 0.03) and more fruit (0.8 servings/3 d; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: A relatively simple approach, providing activity coordinators and basic nutrition education in schools, significantly reduces the rate of excessive weight gain in children, although this may be limited to those not initially overweight. This trial was registered at Australian Clinical Trials Registry as #12605000578606.

Key Words: Obesity prevention • body mass index • BMI • weight gain • child • physical activity • healthy eating







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition