AJCN North Carolina Research Campus
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St-Onge, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Gower, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by St-Onge, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Gower, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by St-Onge, M.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Gower, B.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 86, No. 5, 1316-1322, November 2007
© 2007 American Society for Nutrition


ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Intramyocellular lipid content is lower with a low-fat diet than with high-fat diets, but that may not be relevant for health1,2,3

Marie-Pierre St-Onge, Bradley R Newcomer, Steven Buchthal, Inmaculada Aban, David B Allison, Aubrey Bosarge and Barbara Gower

1 From the Departments of Nutrition Sciences (M-PS-O, DBA, AB, and BG), Diagnostic and Therapeutic Sciences (BRN), Medicine (SB), and Biostatistics (IA and DBA) and the Clinical Nutrition Research Center (M-PS-O, DBA, and BG), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Background: Fat deposition in muscle has been found to be related to metabolic risk.

Objective: This study compared soleus intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) concentrations after consumption of weight-maintaining, controlled diets differing in total fat and fat type.

Design: This study consisted of 3 phases of 25 d each in a crossover, controlled feeding design. The low-fat (LF) diet provided 30.8% and 5.2% of energy from fat and polyunsaturated fat (PUFA), respectively. Two higher-fat diets were tested: the high-fat (HF) diet provided 37.9% and 5.8% of energy from fat and PUFA, respectively, and the high-PUFA (HPUFA) diet provided 36.3% and 9.7% of energy from fat and PUFA, respectively. Twenty-four men and women [age range: 19–65 y; body mass index (in kg/m2): 20–35] whose LDL and glucose concentrations were between 130 and 180 mg/dL and <126 mg/dL, respectively, completed all study phases.

Results: IMCL content was 1.88 times as high after the HF diet (P = 0.005) and 1.71 times as high after the HPUFA diet (P = 0.002) as after the LF diet. There was no significant correlation between percentage fat mass or waist circumference and IMCL content. With pooled data from all diets, there was no significant correlation between IMCL content and insulin or glucose concentration. There was no significant difference in IMCL content in subjects with or without the metabolic syndrome or in subjects with LDL particle pattern A or B.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that IMCL content is not modulated by dietary fat type but by total fat intake and that reducing fat intake effectively lowers IMCL. However, the metabolic implications of having lower IMCL concentrations are not clear.

Key Words: Snacks • polyunsaturated fat • trans fat • saturated fat • insulin • intramyocellular lipid • metabolic syndrome







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Nutrition